Constitutional principles in public administrator's decision-making under the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2018.2.1.97Keywords:
constitutional principle, good administration, public administrationAbstract
This paper serves few purposes. First, it examines the principles of public administration in Lithuania. Good administration principle is analysed as constitutional principle relying on the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Second, it explores impact of the decisions of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania to the contemporary judicial review of Lithuanian administrative courts. Therefore, one of the latest rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania related to the spelling of names and family names in the passports of citizens of the Republic of Lithuania will be reviewed.
References
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000/C 364/01).
Decision of Supreme Council of the Republic of Lithuania on writing of names and surnames in the passport of the citizen of the Republic of Lithuania, 31 January1991 No I-1031, Vilnius.
Law on Public Administration or Law on Administrative Proceedings. 14 January 1999 No VIII-1029, Vilnius.
Law on the Basis of Law-making. 18 September 2012 No XI-2220, Vilnius.
Law on Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. 31 May 1994 No I-480, Vilnius.
Law on the Coordination of Public and Private Interests. 2 June 1997 No VIII-371, Vilnius.
Law on Public Administration. 17 June 1999 No VIII-1234, Vilnius.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Good Administration.
Bulgakov v. Ukraine, no. 59894/00, ECtHR (11 September 2007).
Case law of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania applying the provisions of the Law on Public Administration of the Republic of Lithuania. Approved by the justices of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania in 1st of June, 2016.
Johansson v. Finland, no. 10163/02, ECtHR (Fourth Section) (6 September 2007).
Malgožata Runevič-Vardyn and Łukasz Paweł Wardyn v Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės administracija and Others. Case C-391/09; ECLI:EU:C:2011:291.
Mentzen v. Latvia, no. 71074/01, ECtHR (Fourth Section) (7 December 2004).
Ruling of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania on the spelling of names and family names in the passports of citizens of the Republic of Lithuania, 21 October 1999. Case No 14/98.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A146-335/2008.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A822-2220/2012.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A444-878/2013.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A858-47/2014.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A143-1486/2014.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No AS858-284/2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19152/ukscy.256
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No eA-1245-662/2015.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No eA-2266-858/2015.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No eA-2142-624/2015.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No eA-2176-662/2017.
Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania. Administrative case No A-2445-624/2017.
Znamenskaya v. Russia – 77785/01 [2005] ECHR 361 (2 June 2005).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
How to Cite
