The realisation of the constitutional principles - the right to good administration and the right to legal remedy - in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2018.2.1.90Keywords:
the right to legal remedy, the right to good administration, Hungary, principle of procedural fairness, reasonable time, duty to justify decisions, obligation for cooperation between the administrative bodies and the clientsAbstract
The paper aims to present the realisation of two procedural principles – the right to good administration and the right to legal remedy – regulated also in the Fundamental Law of Hungary, which entered into force on 1st January 2012. The right to legal remedy has been a constitutional principle since the change of regime (in 1989) and the right to good administration has been constitutionally named only by the Fundamental Law of Hungary. The actuality of the paper is the fact that in Hungary from the 1st of January 2018 completely new codes regulate the general public administrative procedures and the administrative justice. Based on these Acts, a new legal remedy system has been introduced regarding administrative decisions in which the judicial review procedures became – instead of the internal administrative appeal procedures – in most of the cases the firstly used legal remedy possibility regarding administrative decisions. After a short overview of the new legal remedy system which has been introduced regarding administrative decisions, the paper presents the constitutional basis of the right to good administration and the right to legal remedy. Finally, we analyse in detail the latest and most relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court of Hungary and some cases of the Curia of Hungary about the practice of the direct enforcement of the constitutional principles: the right to good administration and the right to legal remedy regarding administrative decisions.
References
BALOGH, Zs. Alkotmánybíróság. In TRÓCSÁNYI, L, SCHANDA, B. (eds.). Bevezetés az alkotmányjogba. Az Alaptörvény és Magyarország alkotmányos intézményei. Budapest : HVG-ORAC, 2016, pp. 406 – 423.
BALOGH-BÉKESI, N. A bírói hatalmi ág az Alaptörvény rendszerében. In IUSTUM AEQUUM SALUTARE, XII., 4 (2016), pp. 9 – 19. Available at <http://ias.jak.ppke.hu/hir/ias/20164sz/02_BaloghBekesi_IAS_2016_4.pdf>. [q. 2018-09-29].
BALOGH-BÉKESI, N. A tisztességes ügyintézéshez és a tisztességes eljáráshoz való jog. In GERENCSÉR, B., BERKES, L., VARGA, Zs. A. (eds.). A hazai és az uniós közigazgatási eljárásjog aktuális kérdései: Current Issues of the National and EU Administrative Procedures (the ReNEUAL Model Rules). Budapest : Pázmány Press, 2015, p. 54.
BOROS, A. Az alapelvek szerepe az uniós és tagállami közigazgatási eljárásjogok rendszerében – A Modell Szabályok értékelése és javaslatok megfogalmazása az uniós alapelvek eljárásjogi szabályozását illetően. In Pro Publico Bono, 2 (2017), pp. 30 – 47.
BOROS, A., PATYI, A. Administrative Appeals and Other Forms of ADR in Hungary. In DRAGOS, D. C., NEAMTU, B. (eds.). Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag, 2014, pp. 279 – 339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1_10
CSINK, L., MAROSI, I. Eljárási jogok. In SCHANDA, B., BALOGH, Zs. (szerk.). Alkotmányjog – Alapjogok. Budapest : Pázmány Press, 2014, p. 271, 273 – 274.
CHRONOWSKI, N. Mikor megfelelő az ügyintézés? Uniós és magyar alapjogvédelmi megfontolások. In Magyar Jog, 3 (2014), p. 137 – 145.
KÜPPER, H.: Magyarország átalakuló közigazgatási bíráskodása. MTA Law Working Papers 2014/59. Budapest : Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, 2014, pp. 19 – 29.
PATYI, A. and others. Közigazgatási hatósági eljárásjog. Budapest-Pécs : Dialóg Campus Kiadó, 2009.
PATYI, A. The Courts and the Judiciary. In VARGA, A. Zs.,PATYI, A., SCHANDA, B. The Basic (Fundamental) Law of Hungary, A commentary of the New Hungarian Constitution. Dublin : Clarus Press, NUPS, 2015, pp. 204 – 213,
POLLÁK, K. Achievement of the right to legal remedy in the Hungarian Administratives Procedures. In CICKANOVA, D., ILLYOVA, Z., MICATEK, V., RUZICKA, O. (eds.). Collection of Papers from the International Academic Conference Bratislava Legal Forum 2013. Bratislava : Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law, 2014, pp. 121 – 131.
POLLÁK, K. Historical roots of articicle XXVIII, section 7 of the fundamental law of Hungary: On the right to seek legal remedy. In BALOGH, E., SULYOK, M. (eds.). Fundamental rights in Austria and Hungary: Research seminar Vienna, 24 – 25. april 2015. Szeged : Iurisperitus Bt., 2015, pp. 29 – 32.
POLLÁK, K. Quo Vadis: Codi6cation of Administrative Procedure Rules in Hungary and in France. In NEMEC, J. 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference: Innovation Governance in the Public Sector., Kazan, Oroszország, 2017. 05. 18 – 2017. 05. 20. Bratislava : NISPAcee, 2017, pp. 1 – 8.
SULYOK, T. A tisztességes eljáráshoz való jog újabb kihívásai. In Alkotmánybírósági Szemle, 2 (2015).
TÉGLÁSI, A. Az Alkotmánybíróság. In TÉGLÁSI, A. (ed.). Az állam szervezete. Budapest : NKE 2018, pp. 160 – 180.
VICE ÁDÁNY, T., BALOGH-BÉKESI, N., BALOGH, Zs., HAJAS, B.: Rights and Freedoms. In VARGA, A. Zs., PATYI, A., SCHANDA, B. The Basic (Fundamental) Law of Hungary, A commentary of the New Hungarian Constitution. Dublin : Clarus Press, NUPS, 2015, pp. 79 – 123.
Thesis regarding procedural fairness prepared by BALOGH-BEKESI Nora in a co-project of the Constitutional Court of Hungary and the Curia of Hungary (under publication).
Fundamental Law of Hungary
Act I. of 2017 on Administrative Justice
Act CL. of 2016 on General Public Administration Procedures
European Convention on Human Rights
Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
Decision 49/1998. (XI. 27.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 1/2017. (I. 17.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 39/1997 (VII.1.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 39/1997 (VII.1.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 5/1992. (I. 30.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 9/1992. (I. 30.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 7/2013. (III.1.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 9/2017. (IV. 18.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision 30/1992. (V. 26.) of the Constitutional Court of Hungary
Decision Kfv.IV.37.038 / 2016 of the Curia of Hungary
Decision1/2009 KJE of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.II.37.078/2012/8. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.II.37.794/2013/4. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.II.37.621/2013/7. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.IV.35.038/2014/5. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.II.37.574/2015/4. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.III.37.825/2015/8. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.I.35.760/2016/6. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.I.35.122/2016/6. of the Curia of Hungary
Decision Kfv.IV.35.058/2016/7. of the Curia of Hungary
Official Translations/Summaries of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of Hungary: http://www.codices.coe.int/NXT/gateway.dll/CODICES/precis/eng/eur/hun/hun-1997-2-008?fn=document-frameset.htm$f=templates$3.0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
How to Cite
