Administrative Contract in Administrative Matters: Slovenian Law in Comparative Perspective

Katja Štemberger Brizani

doi:10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.717

Authors

Katja Štemberger Brizani University of Ljubljana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-8622

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.717

Keywords:

ADR, Administrative Law, Administrative Contract, Slovenian Law, Principle of legality, Public Interest

Abstract

Administrative contracts are also known in Slovenian law, where they are mainly used as an instrument to regulate in more detail the (previously issued) administrative act, and generally cannot replace the issuance of an administrative act. Namely, the General Administrative Procedure Act only provides for settlement between parties with opposing (private law) interests. However, the elements of administrative contracts as an ADR mechanism can be found in other (sectoral) legislation, but are often very deficiently regulated, leading to the application of private law rules that govern contractual relations and which are not adapted to administrative law relations. Given all the advantages of alternative dispute resolution and shortcomings of the current legal framework, Slovenian law should also – while respecting all the specific features of administrative decision-making and following the example of selected comparative-law regimes – systematically regulate subordinate administrative contracts (replacing administrative acts), at least for some administrative matters. They should be limited only to those areas of administrative functioning where the administration has a certain margin of discretion in determining the content of the decision on the administrative matter. This means, on the other hand, that the possibility of a subordinate administrative contract should normally be excluded in the case of legally binding decision-making since the content of such a decision is predetermined and the administrative authority is bound by it (principle of legality). However, the administrative authority must have a specific power to conclude such a contract in a (sectoral) law – a general power to conclude subordinate administrative contracts is not sufficient due to the risk of infringing the principle of equality and legality.

Author Biography

Katja Štemberger Brizani , University of Ljubljana

Assistant Professor
Department of Administrative Law
Faculty of Law
Poljanski nasip 2
1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
katja.stembergerbrizani@pf.uni-lj.si

References

Aedmaa, A., Lopman, E., Parrest, N., Pilving, I. and Vene, E. (2004). Haldusmenetluse Käsiraamat. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Athanasiadou, N. (2017). Der Verwaltungsvertrag im EU – Recht, Beiträge zum Verwaltungsrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Sierbeck.

Balthasar, A. (2018). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law: A Major Step Forward to Enhance Citizens’ Satisfaction or Rather a Trojan Horse for the Rule of Law?. Elte Law Journal, 1, 9–17.

Đerđa, D. and Wegner, J. (2020). Non-jurisdictional forms of disposing an administrative matter: Croatian and Polish experiences. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 41(1), 41–67.

Faber, H. (1989). Verwaltungsrecht, 2. Aufl., Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Gurlit, E. (2000). Verwaltungsvertrag und Gesetz. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Hegenbart, M., Sakař, B. et al (2008). Stavební zákon. Komentář. Prague: C. H. Beck.

Hendrych, D. et al (2009). Správní právo. Obecná část. 7. vydání. Prague: C. H. Beck.

Hüther, P., Blänsdorf, J. and Lepej, A. (2022a). Der öffentlich-rechtliche Vertrag gem. §§ 54ff. VwVfG - Teil 1. Juristische Ausbildung, 3, 304–315, https://doi.org/10.1515/jura-2021-2993

Hüther, P., Blänsdorf, J. and Lepej, A. (2022b). Der öffentlich-rechtliche Vertrag gem. §§ 54ff. VwVfG - Teil 2. Juristische Ausbildung, 5, 553–565, https://doi.org/10.1515/jura-2021-2994

Javna uprava 2020: Strategija razvoja javne uprave 2015–2020. Ljubljana : Ministrstvo za javno upravo, 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MJU/Kakovost-in-inovativnost-v-javni-upravi/Strategija/Strategija-razvoja-javne-uprave-2015-2020.pdf (accessed on 18.08.2023).

Jerovšek, T. (2000). Nadomeščanje upravnega akta s sporazumnim urejanjem razmerij. VI. Dnevi javnega prava, Inštitut za javno upravo, Ljubljana, 163–174.

Kerševan, E. (2004). Uprava in sodni nadzor. Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.

Kerševan, E. and Androjna, V. (2017). Upravno procesno pravo: upravni postopek in upravni spor, 2., spremenjena in dopolnjena izdaja. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

Kovač, P. (2016). Izzivi alternativnega reševanja sporov v upravnih razmerjih v Sloveniji in širše. Zbornik znanstvenih razprav, 76, 69–97, 270–271.

Kovač, P. (2017). Smernice evropeizacije upravnega procesnega prava. Javna uprava, 53(1/2), 67–83, 114–115.

Lovšin, Š. (2023). Možnost poravnave med organom in stranko po ZUP in ZPOmK-2. Podjetje in delo, 1, 70–89.

Macedo Weiß, P. (1999). Pacta sunt servanda im Verwaltungsvertrag, Europäische Hochschulschriften. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.

Maurer, H. (2011). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 18. Aufl. München: C. H. Beck.

Noguellou, R. and Stelkens, U. (2010). Droit comparé des Contrats Publics. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Ondruš, R. (2005). Správní řád. Nový zákon s důvodovou zprávou a poznámkami. Prague: Linde Praha.

Pirnat, R. (2000). Pravni problemi upravne pogodbe. Javna uprava, 36(2), 143–162.

Pudelka, J. (2017). Öffentlich-rechtliche Verträge als Grundlage der Entstehung, Änderung und Beendigung von Rechtsverhaltnissen unter Berucksichtigung des Steuerrechts. Problems of Legality, 139, pp. 211–217.

Richer, L. (2012). Droit des contrats administratifs, 8. éd. Paris: L.G.D.J.

Rogić Lugarić, T. and Čičin-Šain, N. (2014). Alternativno rješavanje sporova u poreznom pravu: utopija ili rješenje?. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 64(3), 347–375.

Rusch, W. (2014). Citizens First: Modernisation of the System of Administrative Procedures in South-Eastern Europe. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava: časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave, 14(1), 189–228.

Schulze-Fielitz, H. (2012). Grundmodi der Aufgabenwahrnehmung. In: Hoffmann-Riem, W., Schmidt-Aßmann, E. and Voßkuhle, A. (eds.). Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, Bd. II, 2. Aufl. München: C. H. Beck.

Smrekar, N. (2019). Komentar k 57. členu ZUS-1. In: Kerševan, E. (ed.). Zakon o upravnem sporu: s komentarjem. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

Spannowsky, W. (1994). Grenzen der Verwaltungshandelns durch Verträge und Absprachen, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Štemberger, K. (2021). Upravna pogodba kot posebni institut upravnega prava - kje smo in kako naprej?. Pravnik, 76(5-6), 249–272.

Štemberger, K. (2023a). Legal Protection of Concession Contracts – at the Interface between Public and Private Law and European and National Law. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 32(1), 335–355, http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.1.335-355

Štemberger, K. (2023b). Public and Private Law Aspects of Breach of the Concession Contract in Slovenian Law. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava: časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave, 23(2), 241–271, https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.23.2.3

Waline, J. (2016). Droit administratif, 26. éd. Paris: Dalloz, Paris.

Žuber, B. and Marflak Trontelj, J. (2021). Alternativno reševanje upravnih sporov: ali lahko redko uporabljena metoda danes postane rešitev za jutri?. Pravna praksa, 46, 8–10.