Toolbox of the Public Administration Entity. Intersection of the Principle of Legality and Administrative Discretion in Exercising the Revocation of an Administrative Decision

The Case of Lithuania

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2021.5.2.255

Keywords:

administrative procedures, revocation (self-annulment), legality, administrative discretion

Abstract

For some, revocation of an administrative decision arises doubts, for others, it is a legal measure ensuring that public administration entities are able to respond to changing circumstances and adopt not only legitimate, but also fair decisions by striking a balance between private and public interests. This paper aims to analyse the choice of Lithuania with respect to the implementation and application of the public administration entities right to revoke its previously adopted administrative decision. In order to achieve this goal, the results of analysis of the role of the principle of legality and administrative discretion in the decision-making process, legal regulation of public administration and case-law are revealed. The analysis will show that there is room for the possible systematisation of the administrative procedures, aiming to ensure that public administration entities are able to respond to the ongoing changes in order to fulfil the objectivities based on which the particular public administration entities were established.

Author Biography

Simona Bareikytė, Vilnius University

Simona Bareikytė
PhD. Student
Vilnius University, Faculty of Law
Saulétekio al. 9 - I rūmai
10222 Vilnius
Lithuania

References

Books:

Andruškevičius, A. (2008). Administracinė teisė: bendrieji teorijos klausimai, valdymo aktų institutas, ginčo santykių jurisprudenciniai aspektai. Registrų centras.

Andruškevičius, A. and Paškevičiene, L. (2011). Viešojo administravimo teisiniai pagrindai: mokomoji knyga. Registrų centras.

Bakaveckas, A. (2012). Administracinė teisė: teorija ir praktika. I dalis. Leidykla “Mes.”

Dambrauskienė, G. (2004). Lietuvos teisės pagrindai. Justitia.

Schønberg, S. J. (2003). Legitimate expectations in administrative law. Oxford University Press.

Seerden, R. J. G. H. (Ed.). (2018). Comparative Administrative Law. Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and United States. (4th ed.). Intersentia.

Cliza, M. C. Revocation of administrative act.

Legal acts:

Austria, General Administrative Procedure Act (1991).

Croatia, General Administrative Procedure Act (2009).

Germany, Administrative Procedure Act (1976). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1371984

Italy, Administrative Procedure Act (1990).

Lithuania, Law on Land Reform (1991).

Lithuania, Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania (1992).

Lithuania, Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (1993).

Lithuania, Law on Animal Breeding (1994).

Lithuania, Law on the Bank of Lithuania (1994).

Lithuania, Law on Local Self-Government of the Republic of Lithuania (1994).

Lithuania, Law on Credit Unions (1995).

Lithuania, Law on Construction (1996).

Lithuania, Law on the Legal Protection of Personal Data (1996).

Lithuania, Law on Competition (1999).

Lithuania, Law on Public Administration (1999).

Lithuania, Law on Central Credit Unions (2000).

Lithuania, Law on the Legal Protection of Personal Data (2000).

Lithuania, Law on Construction (2001).

Lithuania, Law on the Control of Weapons and Ammunition (2002).

Lithuania, Law on the Control of the Circulation of Civil Pyrotechnic Articles (2002).

Lithuania, Law on the Legal Protection of Personal Data (2003).

Lithuania, Statute of the Internal Service (2003).

Lithuania, Constitutional Act concerning the Membership of the Republic of Lithuania in the European Union, (2004).

Lithuania, Law on Banks (2004).

Lithuania, Law on the Legal Status of Aliens (2004).

Lithuania, Law on the Protection of Persons and Property (2004).

Lithuania, Law on Tax Administration (2004).

Lithuania, Financial Instruments Law on Markets (2007).

Lithuania, Rules for the Examination of Applications and Complaints and the Servicing of Persons in Public Administrative Entities (2007).

Lithuania, Law on the Legal Protection of Personal Data (2008).

Lithuania, Law on Competition (2012).

Lithuania, Law on Collective Investment Undertakings for Informed Investors (2013).

Lithuania, Law on State Supervision of Territorial Planning and Construction (2013).

Poland, Code of Administrative Procedure (1960).

Spain, Law on Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (2015).

Slovenia, General Administrative Procedure Act (1999).

Case law:

Republic of Lithuania, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 34/03 (8 August 2006).

Republic of Lithuania, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 09/2008 (29 November 2010).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A415-2203/2006 (18 December 2006).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A2-161/2005 (4 February 2005).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A756-35/2010 (1 February 2010).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A525-2380/2011 (27 June 2011).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A602-1356/2012 (3 May 2012).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A602-227/2012 (12 March 2012).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A602-151/2012 (8 November 2012).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A143-79/2013 (29 January 2013).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A602-1865/2013 (2 December 2013).

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A525-560/2014 (19 February 2014).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A261-706/2014 (14 May 2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484375051.002

Republic of Lithuania, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A3277-525/2018 (7 February 2018).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, A-2995-492/2018 (13 November 2018).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, eA-1055-602/2018 (14 November 2018).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, eR-2-442/2019 (17 April 2019).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, eA-934-492/2019 (2 October 2019).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, eA-935-492/2019 (29 October 2019).

Republic of Lithuania, Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, eA-687-602/2019 (13 November 2019).

Other:

Research Network on EU Administrative Law. (2017). ReNEUAL Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure (H. C. H. Hofmann, J.-P. Schneider, J. Ziller, J.-B. Auby, P. Craig, D. Curtin, G. della Cananea, D.-U. Galetta, J. Mendes, O. Mir, U. Stelkens, and M. Wierzbowsk (Eds.)). Oxford University Press. http://www.reneual.eu/images/Home/ReNEUAL--Model-Rules-update-2015_rules-only-2017.PDF

Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Good Administration (2007).

Travaux preparatoires:

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (2016).

Downloads

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Bareikytė, S. (2021). Toolbox of the Public Administration Entity. Intersection of the Principle of Legality and Administrative Discretion in Exercising the Revocation of an Administrative Decision: The Case of Lithuania. Bratislava Law Review, 5(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2021.5.2.255

Issue

Section

Discussion Papers and Commentaries

Categories