Preventive Detention on Remand in Pre-Trial Proceedings from the Point of View of Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.2.882Keywords:
Personal Liberty, Restriction, Detention on Remand, Reason for Detention, Preventive Detention, Nature of CrimeAbstract
In the article the authors pay attention to the detention on remand, which is the most serious procedural interference in the system of criminal law means to the personal liberty of an individual, accused of a crime. This institute is characterised in terms of national and international aspects of protection of the individual who has been taken into detention on remand. The authors pay special attention to the reasons for the so-called preventive detention on remand in pre-trial proceedings from the point of view of theory and application practice of courts.
References
Çali, B. (2020). The Whole Is More than the Sum of its Parts. The Demirtaş v Turkey (No 2) Grand Chamber Judgment of the ECtHR. Verfassungsblog. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-whole-is-more-than-the-sum-of-its-parts/ (accessed on 10.12.2024).
Drgonec, J. (2015). Ústava Slovenskej republiky. Teória a prax. [Constitution of the Slovak Republic. Theory and practice]. Bratislava. C. H. Beck.
Kmec, J., Kosař, D., Kratochvíl, J. and Bobek, M. (2012). Evropská úmluva o lidských právech. Komentář [European Convention on Human Rights. Commentary]. 1st edition. Prague: C. H. Beck.
López, M. L. V. (2021). Recent European Court of Justice case-law on Directive 2016/343 on the presumption of innocence (Milev, RH & DK): are pre-trial detentions covered by this instrument? ERA Forum, 22, 137–146.
Mowbray, A. (2009). An Examination of the European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to Overruling its Previous Case Law. Human Rights Law Review, 2, 179–201.
Orosz, L., Svák, J. et al. (2021). Ústava Slovenskej republiky. Komentár [Constitution of the Slovak Republic. Commentary]. Volume I. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer SR.
Repík, B. (2002). Evropská úmluva o lidských právech a trestní právo [The European Convention on Human Rights and Criminal Law]. Prague: Orac.
Schabas, W. A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson, M. T. and Mayson, S. G. (2022). Pretrial Detention and the Value of Liberty. Virginia Law Review Association, 108(5), 709–782.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ L 65, 11.3.2016, pp. 1–11).
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2023/681 of 8 December 2022 on procedural rights of suspects and accused persons subject to pre-trial detention and on material detention conditions (OJ L 86, 24.3.2023, pp. 44–57).
Act No. 301/2005 Coll., Criminal Procedure Code of the Slovak Republic, as amended.
ECtHR, Neumeister v. Austria, app. no. 1936/63, 27 June 1968.
ECtHR, de Wilde v. Belgium, app. nos. 2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66, 18 June 1971.
ECtHR, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, app. no. 6301/73, 24 October 1979.
ECtHR, Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, app. nos. 12244/86, 12245/86, 12383/86, 30 August 1990.
ECtHR, Letellier v. France, app. no. 12369/86, 26 June 1991.
ECtHR, Clooth v. Belgium, app. no. 12718/87, 12 December 1991.
ECtHR, Tomasi v. France, app. no. 12850/87, 27 August 1992.
ECtHR, Kudla v. Poland [GC], app. no. 30210/96, 26 October 2000.
ECtHR, Sulaoja v. Estonia, app. no. 55939/00, 15 February 2005.
ECtHR, Khudoyorov v. Russia, app. no. 6847/02, 8 November 2005.
ECtHR, Selçuk v. Turkey, app. no. 21768/02, 10 January 2006.
ECtHR, McKay v. the United Kingdom, app. no. 543/03, 3 October 2006.
ECtHR, Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, app. no. 11948/08, 20 February 2014.
ECtHR, Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], app. no. 23755/07, 5 July 2016.
ECtHR, Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], app. no. 72508/13, 28 November 2017.
ECtHR, Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey [GC] (No. 2), app. no. 14305/17, 22 December 2020.
ECtHR, Azizov and Novruzlu v. Azerbaijan, app. nos. 65583/13, 70106/13, 18 February 2021.
ECtHR, Kurt v. Austria [GC], app. no. 62903/15, 15 June 2021.
ECtHR, Sardar Babayev v. Azerbaijan, app. nos. 34015/17, 26896/18, 1 February 2024.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 21 June 2001, Case No. III ÚS 185/01, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 23/2001.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 18 November 2004, Case No. III ÚS 605/04, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 55/2004.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 3 February 2016, Case No. I. ÚS 35/2016.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 4 February 2016, Case No II. ÚS 115/2016.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 9 March 2016, Case No. I. ÚS 162/2016.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 28 June 2016, Case No. III. ÚS 447/2016.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 10 August 2016, Case No. II ÚS 626/2016.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 2 December 2020, Case No. I. ÚS 552/2020.
Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 9 March 2021, Case no. III. ÚS 202/2021.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 3 May 2021, Case No. 2 Tost 22/2021.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 3 August 2021, Case No. 1 Tost/23/2021.
Resolution of the SCC of 28 November 2021, Case No. 1 Tp 23/2021.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 15 December 2021, Case No. 4 Tost 55/2021.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 18 May 2023, Case No. 5 Tostš 9/2023.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 15 November 2023, Case No. 5 Tost-š 24/2023.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic of 21 November 2023, Case No. 1 Tost-sh/17/2023.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (1st Senate) of 12 September 1996, Case No. I. ÚS 62/96, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 74/1996.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic (III. senate) of 26 September 1996, Case No. III. ÚS 18/96, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 88/1996.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 7 April 2005, Case No I. ÚS 585/02, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 77/2005.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 11 April 2007, Case No. I. ÚS 695/06, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 63/2007.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 16 September 2014, Case No. II ÚS 2086/14, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 170/2014.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic of 25 October 2017, Case No. III ÚS 1876/17, Collection of findings and resolutions of the Constitutional Court, 17/2017.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 9 July 2003, Case No. IV. ÚS 124/2003.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 17 August 2021, Case No. IV. ÚS 384/2021.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 22 May 2013, Case No. II. ÚS 597/2012.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 24 September 2014, Case No. I. ÚS 250/2014, 23/2014 Coll.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 18 February 2015, Case No. III. ÚS 29/2015.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic of 30 October 2019, Case No. I ÚS 417/2018.
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic 27 April 2021, Case No. III. ÚS 227/2020.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bratislava Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
How to Cite
