Fraud in documentary letters of credit: A comparative study of excising international legal frameworks

Hamed Alavi

doi:10.46282/blr.2017.1.1.65

Authors

Hamed Alavi Tallinn School of Law, Tallinn University of Technology, Faculty of Law, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2017.1.1.65

Keywords:

letters of credit, fraud

Abstract

Documentary letters of credit are among most popular trade finance instruments used in international business. Despite the fact that main purpose derived from application of documentary letters of credit is to reduce the risk of trade, their mere documentary nature makes them vulnerable to the problem fraud. There is a huge interest among legal scholars and academicians to analyse the nature of fraud in documentary letters of credit due to its important financial effect on smooth process of international trade and also diversified approach of different legal systems to this particular problem. However, majority of conducted studies are limited to most popular legal systems including British and American law. Need for studying the LC fraud in a comprehensive comparative manner among existing international legal frameworks is well noticed for long time. Due to their international nature, LC operation is subjected to substantial number of legal frameworks which most of them are either taking a silent position towards problem of fraud or do not show uniform approach to the it. In this paper, author tries to study di$erent sources of law in documentary letters of credit and their approach to the problem of fraud in a comparative manner. The main research question is what would be the position of fraud rule in applicable legal frameworks to the international LC operation and how do they approach the problem of fraud committed by beneficiary in documentary letters of credit? For this purpose, paper is divided into four main parts: After the introduction, second part will discuss the sources of law applicable to international LC transaction. Third section will analyse the legal nature of fraud in LC transaction. Fourth section will scrutinize the legal approach of different legal frameworks to fraud in documentary letters of credit and finally, the last section will sum up the discussion with concluding remarks.

References

ALAVI, H.: Autonomy Principle and Fraud Exception in Documentary Letters of Credit, a Comparative Study between United States and England. In: International and Comparative Law Review, 2015, 15, 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0035

ALAVI, H.: Documentary Letters of Credit, Legal Nature and Sources of Law. In: Journal of legal studies, 2016, 17, 31, pp. 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1515/jles-2016-0012

ALAVI, H.: Illegality as an Exception to Principle of Autonomy in Documentary Letters of Credit; A Comparative Approach. In: Korea University Law Review, 2016, 20, pp. 3-23.

ARKINS, J.R.C.: Snow White V. Frost White: The New Cold War In Banking Law. In: Journal of International Banking Law, J.I.B.L., 2000, 15, 2, pp. 30-41.

BARANAELLO, J.: Understanding the URDG 758. Available at: http://www.fpsc.com/DB/TreasuryPulse/Fall2010/Article4.html

BARENS, J. G. – BYRNE, J. E.: Letters of Credit. In: BYRNES, J. E. - BYRNES, Ch. S. (Eds.): Annual Survey of Letter of Credit Law and Practice. Montgomery Village, MD: The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice, Inc., 2007.

BARENS, J. G. – BYRNE, J. E.: Letters of Credit: 2000. In: Business Law, 2001, 56, 4. Reprinted in: Annual Survey of Letter of Credit Law & Practice, 2002, 13, 18.

BARSKI, K. A.: Letters of Credit: A Comparison of Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial Code and the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. In: Loy. L. Rev., 1996, 41, pp. 735-751.

BERTRAMS, R.: Bank Guarantees in International Trade. 3d. ed. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.

BUCKLEY, R. P.: The 1993 Revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. In: Journal of Banking & Finance Law & Practice, 1995, 77.

BUCKLEY, R.P. – GAO, X.: Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law. In: Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L., 2003, 13.

BUCKLEY, R.P. – GAO, X.: The Development of the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law: The Journey so Far and the Road Ahead. In: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Economic Law, 2002, 23.

BYRNE, J. E.: Preface. In: BYRNE, J. E. et al.: International Standbypractices ISP98 6. Paris: ICC Publishing, 1998.

D’ARCY, L.: Schmitthoff’s Export Trade - The law and Practice of International Trade. 10th ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000.

DOLAN, J. F.: Commentary on Legislative Developments in Letter of Credit Law: An Interim Report. In: Banking & Fin. L. Rev., 8, 2002, 53.

DOLAN, J. F.: The Law of Letters of Credit: Commercial and Standby Credits. Rev. Ed. Boston: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, 1996.

ELLINGER, P. – NOE, D.: The Law and Practice of Documentary Letters of Credit. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2010.

ENONCHONG, N.: The Autonomy Principle of Letters of Credit: An Illegality Exception? In: Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2006.

ENONCHONG, N.: The independence principle of letters of credit and demand guarantees. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

FLETCHER, G. P. – SHEPPARD, S.: American Law in a Global Context: The Basics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

GAO, X.: The fraud rule in the law of letters of credit: a comparative study. Vol. 2. The Hague: Kluwer law international, 2002.

GARCIA, R.L.F.: Autonomy principle of the letter of credit. In: Mexican Law Review, 2009.

GOODE, R.: Abstract Payment Undertakings and the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce. In: Saint Louis University Law Journal, 1995, 39.

Int’l Chamber of Commerce, ICC Publication No. 205-207. Paris: ICC, 1998.

KATZ, R.: Report delivered at the I.C.C. Hong Kong meeting. Reprinted in: Int’l Chamber of Commerce, ICC Publication No. 470/893. Paris: ICC, 1999.

KELLY-LOUW, M.: Selective legal aspects of bank demand guarantees (Doctoral dissertation). Pretoria: University of South Africa, 2009.

KOZLCHYK, B., Letters of Credit. In: Int’l Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, 1979, 10.

KUO-ELLEN, L. S.: UCP Needs to Change. In: Journal of Money Laundering Control, 2002, 5, 3.

KURKETLA, M.: Letters of Credit Under International Trade Law: UCC, UCP and Law Merchant. New York, London & Rome: Oceana Publications. Inc., 1985.

LEAKOCK, S. J.: Fraud in International Transaction: Enjoining Payment of Letters of credit in International Transactions. In: Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 885,1984 (Fall), 17.

MALEK, A. – QUEST, D.: Documentary Credits - The Law and Practice of Documentary Credits Including Standby Credits and Demand Guarantees. 4th Ed. Haywards Heath, West Sussex: Tottel, 2009.

MOONEY, J. L. – BLODGETT, M. S.: Letters of Credit in the Global Economy: Implications for International Trade. In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 1995, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-9518(95)90016-0

ROWE, M.: Do We Need a Transnational Law on Documentary Credits? Michael Rowe & Bernard Wheble Debate. In: DCI (ICC), 1998, Spring, 4, 2.

TURNER, P.S.: New Rules for Standby Letters of Credit: The International Standby Practices. In: Banking & Finance Law Review, 1999, 14.

United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit art. 5, Dec. 11, 1995, A/RES/50/48. Available at http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/ payments/guarantees/guarantees.pdf

WUNNIKE, B. – WUNNICKE, Diane B.: Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit. 2nd ed, New York: Wiley Law Publications, 1996.

ZHANG, Y.: Approaches to Resolving the International Documentary Letters of Credit Fraud Issue. Doctoral Dissertation. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland, 2011.