The Emergence of Lesbian Theory of Law: Why and How the Lesbian Theory of Law Has Been Developed

Dominik Šoltys

doi:10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.513

Authors

Dominik Šoltys University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-4722

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.513

Keywords:

Lesbianism, Lesbian Jurisprudence, Heterosexism, Lesbian Theory of Law

Abstract

In the late eighties of the 20th century, the methodological reflection of lesbian identity arose within the framework of feminist jurisprudence. Although the original intention was to include lesbian identity in a woman's identity, in a relatively short period there was a sudden break. Lesbian identity became a distinct identity considered to be the central position of lesbian jurisprudence. This study presents the peculiar features of lesbian legal theory. It tries to point out the historical and ideological determinants that led lesbianism to enter (legal) feminism. Lesbian separatism also took part in this development. It turned out to be the main reason for the separation of lesbian legal scholars from the feminist jurisprudence. The study presents the core ideological assumptions that constitute the theoretical nature of the lesbian theory of law, which is based on lesbian (legal) experiences.

Author Biography

Dominik Šoltys, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik

Faculty of Law
Gustav Radbruch Institute of Theory of Law
Kováčska 26
040 75 Košice; Slovakia
dominik.soltys@upjs.sk

References

Arriola, E. R.. (1994). Gendered Inequality: Lesbians, Gays, and Feminist Legal Theory. Berkeley Women´s Law Journal, 9(1), 103-143.

Arriola, E. R.. (2005). Encuentro en el Ambiente de la Teoria: Latina Lesbians and Ruthann Robson's Lesbian Legal Theory. New York City Law Review, 8(2), 519-541, https://doi.org/10.31641/clr080225

Atkinson, T-G. (1974a). Lesbianism and Feminism: Justice For Women as „Unnatural“. In: Atkinson, T-G. Amazon Odyssey (pp. 131-134). New York: Putnam Pub Group.

Atkinson, T-G. (1974b). Strategy and Tactics. In: Atkinson, T-G. Amazon Odyssey (pp. 135-189). New York: Putnam Pub Group.

Bunch, C. (1975). Lesbians in Revolt. In: Myron, N., Bunch, Ch., (eds.), Lesbianism and the Women´s Movement (pp. 29-37). Baltimore: Diana Press.

Cain, P. A. (1989-1990). Feminist Jurisprudence: Grounding the Theories. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 4, 191-214.

Cain, P. A. (1994). Lesbian Perspective, Lesbian Experience, and the Risk of Essentialism. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 2(1), 191-214.

Calhoun, C. (1994). Separating Lesbian Theory from Feminist Theory. Ethics, 104(3), 558-581, https://doi.org/10.1086/293630

Calhoun, C. (2002). Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199257663.001.0001

Carter, C. and Noble, J. (1996). Butch, Femme, and the Woman-Identified Woman: Menage-a-trois of the '90s? Canadian Woman Studies, 16(2), 24-29.

Clarke, C. (1983). Lesbianism: an Act of Resistance. In: Moraga, Ch., Anzaldúa, G. (eds.). This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (pp. 128-137). New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

Crawley, S. (2001). Are Butch and Fem Working-Class and Antifeminist? Gender & Society, 15(2), 175-196.

Davis, F. (1991). Moving The Mountain The Women's Movement in America since 1960. London - New York - Singapore - Sydney - Toronto: Simon & Schuster.

Denissen, A. M. and Saguy, A. C. (2013). Gendered Homophobia and the Contradictions of Workplace Discrimination for Women in the Building Trades. Gender & Society, 28(2), 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213510781

Eaton, M. (1994). At the Intersection of Gender and Sexual Orientation: Toward Lesbian Jurisprudence. Southern California Review of Law & Women´s Studies, 3(2), 183-218.

Echols, A. (2019). Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967 ‒ 1975. London – Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvqmp26c

Elliott and Robson, R. (1993). Un-Domesticated Lesbian Legal Theory: A conversation with Ruthann Robson, author of Lesbian (Out)Law: Survival Under the Rule of Law (Interview). Off Our Backs, 23(10), 10-13.

Eskridge, W. N. Jr. (1994). Gaylegal Narratives. Stanford Law Review, 46(3), 607-646, https://doi.org/10.2307/1229103

Finnis, J. (2011). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.

Finley, L. M. (1989). Breaking Women's Silence in Law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning Nature of Legal Reasoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 64, 886- 910.

Franklin, K. and Chinn, S. E. (1999). Lesbians, Legal Theory and Other Superheroes. N. Y. U. Review of Law & Social Change, 25(2), 301-330, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4188092

Gauntlett, D. (2008) Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

George, R. P. (2004). In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.

Giuffre, P., Dellinger, K. and Williams, C., L. (2008). ‘No Retribution for Being Gay?’: Inequality in Gay-Friendly Workplaces. Sociological Spectrum, 28(3), 254-277, https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170801898380

Hesford, V. (2013). Feeling Women's Liberation. Durham – London: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822397519

Hinojosa, T.J. and Medina, C. (2016). Lesbian Narratives: An Investigation of Identity and Expression. Journal of Counselor Practice, 7(1), 21–40, https://doi.org/10.22229/lnt738024

Jefferson, T. R. (1998). Toward a Black Lesbian Jurisprudence. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 18(2), 263-291.

King, K. (1994). Theory in Its Feminist Travels: Conversations in U. S. Women's Movements. Bloomington – Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

McBean, S. (2021). Feminist diagrams. Feminist Theory, 22(2), 206-225, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700121997182

Radicalesbians (1970). The Woman-Identified Woman. Pittsburgh: Know, Inc..

Radner, H. (2008). Compulsory Sexuality and the Desiring Woman. Sexualities, 11(1-2), 94-100, https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607080110010304

Rich, A. C. (1980). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs, Women: Sex and Sexuality, 5(4), 631-660.

Rich, A. C. (2003). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Journal of Women's History, 15(3), 11-48, https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2003.0079

Robson, R. (1990). Lesbian Jurisprudence? Law & Inequality, 8(3), 443-468.

Robson, R. (1992). Lesbian (Out)Law: Survival Under the Rule of Law. New York: Firebrand Books.

Robson, R. (1993). The Specter of a Lesbian Supreme Court Justice: Problems of Identity in Lesbian Legal Theorizing. St. Thomas Law Review, 5, 433-458.

Robson, R. (1994). Resisting the Family: Repositioning Lesbians in Legal Theory. Signs, 19(5), 975-996, https://doi.org/10.1086/494947

Robson, R. (1998). Sappho Goes to Law School. New York: Columbia University Press.

Robson, R. (2000). The Politics of the Possible: Personal Reflections on a Decade at the City University of New York School of Law. New York City Law Review, 3(2), 245-257, https://doi.org/10.31641/clr030210

Robson, R. and Valentine, S. E. (1990). Lov(H)ers: Lesbians as Intimate Partners and Lesbian Legal Theory. Temple Law Review, 63, 511-542.

Sala, A. and De la Mata Benítez, M. L. (2016). The narrative construction of Lesbian identity: A study using Bruner’s self-indicators. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16650831

Scales, A. C. (2009). Poststructuralism on Trial. In: Albertson Fineman, M., Jackson, J. E., Romero, A. P., (eds.). Feminist and Queer Legal Theory: Intimate Encounters, Uncomfortable Conversations (pp. 395-410). Burlington, USA – Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

Schulman, S. M. (author), Cogswell, K. J., Simo, A. M. (eds.). (1993). The Lesbian Avenger Handbook: A Handy Guide to Homemade Revolution. New York: The Lesbian Avengers.

Solum, L. B. (1997). Indeterminacy and Equality. In: Griffin, S. M. and Moffat, R. C. (eds.), Radical Critiques of the Law (p. 44-66). Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

Šoltys, D. (2022). Identita v právnej vede – právo pohľadom politík identít. In: Bröstl, A., Breichová Lapčáková, M. (eds.), Spravodlivosť, spoločenstvo, sloboda: Zborník zo Zasadnutia slovenskej sekcie IVR pred 30. svetovým kongresom (pp. 123-148). Košice: ŠafárikPress.

Taylor, M., Hodges, S. D. and Kohányi, A. (2002). The Illusion of Independent Agency: Do Adult Fiction Writers Experience Their characters as having minds of their own? Imagination Cognition and Personality, 22(4), 361-379.

Valdes, F. (2000). Sex and Race in Queer Legal Culture: Ruminations on Identities & Interconnectivities. In: Delgado, R., Stefancic, J. (eds.). Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge (pp. 334-339). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

West, R. (1988). Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review, 55(1), 1-72.

Wittig, M. (1992). The Straight Mind. In: Wittig, M. The Straight Mind: And Other Essays (pp. 21-32). Boston: Beacon Press.

Zimmerman, B. (ed.). (2000). Encyclopedia of Lesbian Histories and Cultures: Volume 1. London – New York: Garland Publishing Inc., https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825532

Iniciatíva Inakosť (2017). Celoslovenský LGBT Prieskum: Správa o výsledkoch [online]. Available at: https://inakost.sk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Celoslovensky-LGBT-prieskum-2017-sprava.pdf (accessed on 2023-11-13).