On the False Myth of Legal Neutrality: Some Remarks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2025.9.1.823Keywords:
Feminist Legal Theory, Law, Sovereignty, Murder of Honour, Shotgun WeddingAbstract
Studies on gender, legal feminist theories, women’s studies, and, in general, feminism provide fundamental and indispensable contributions to a critical discussion of the field of law and to the contemporary philosophical debate of legality. They are characterised by a considerable expansion of the thematic area. This paper does not claim to be an introduction to the feminist analysis of the law in general or of specific theories of law, but it arises at the halfway point between some criticisms and the proposal of alternative elements. One of the aims of this study is to analyse how sovereignty is connected to the patriarchal view of society and especially to a particular concept of law. For this reason, the study will address the issue raised by some criticisms of law based on arguments developed by a feminist legal theory that underlines the false neutrality of law. My interest is to discuss the patriarchal nature of the law and some of its specific legal categories (such as sovereignty) and to highlight the need to rethink and redefine them. It starts from the premise, as underlined, that the traditional discourse on law is a discourse of power, even camouflaged at times as cognitive discourse. Then, it analyses how legal feminist theory could contribute to overruling the patriarchal structure of society and redefining traditional legal concepts (such as sovereignty). To conclude, this study tries to highlight tensions and raise constructive reflections on the issue.
References
Literature:
Abbagnano, N. (2008). Dizionario di filosofia. Torino: Utet.
Alkan, Y. S. (2012). Feminist Legal Methods: Theoretical Assumptions, Advantages, and Potential Problems. Ankara Law Review, 9(2), 157-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Lawrev_0000000090
Bartlett, K.T. (1990). Feminist Legal Methods. Harvard Law Review, 103(4), 829-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341478
Belmonti, M. G. et al. (1980). Un processo per stupro: dal programma della Rete due della Televisione italiana. Torino: Einaudi.
Bourke, J. (2009). Stupro. Storia della violenza sessuale dal 1860 ad oggi. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Braudel, F. (1973). Scritti sulla storia. Milan: Mondadori.
Calabrò, A. R. and Grasso, L. (2004). Dal movimento femminista al femminismo diffuso. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Camargo Kreuz, L. R. (2018). Domínio do corpo:o aborto entre leis e juzes. Curitiba: Íthala.
Casadei, T. (eds). (2015). Donne, Diritto, Diritti. Prospettive del giusfemminismo.Torino: Giappichelli.
Castells, M. (2002). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199255771.001.0001
Cavarero, A. and Restaino F. (2002). Le filosofie femministe. Milano: Mondadori.
Cavarero, A. (1994). Presentazione. In: MacKinnon C., Soltanto parole. Milan: Giuffrè.
Champeaux, J. (2002). La religione dei romani. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Cipriani, F. (1991), Storie di processualisti e di oligarchi. La procedura civile nel Regno d’Italia (1866-1936). Milan: Giuffrè.
Curzio, P. (2013). Le maestre di Senigallia. Questione Giustizia, (4), 165-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/QG2013-004013
Cutrufelli, M. R. (2016). Il giudice delle donne. Milan: Frassinelli.
Danna, D. (2013). I confini dell’azione pubblica: matrimoni forzati e combinati. Athenea digital, 13(2), 65-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v13n2.991
Estrich, S. (1987). Real Rape. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Facchi, A. (1999). Il pensiero femminista, sul diritto: un percorso da Carol Gilligan a Tove Stang Dah. In: Zanetti, G. (ed.), Filosofi del diritto contemporaneo (pp. 129-153). Milan: Raffaello Cortina.
Facchi, A. (2001). I diritti nell’Europa multiculturale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Facchi, A. (2007). Breve storia dei diritti umani. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Faralli, C. (2006). A filosofia contemporânea do direito, temas e desafios. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Ferlito, S. (2005). Le religioni, il giurista, e l’antropologo. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Ferlito, S. (2016). Il volto beffardo del diritto. Ragione economica e giustizia. Milan: Mimesis edizioni.
Ferrajoli, L. (1993). La differenza sessuale e le garanzie dell’uguaglianza. Democrazia e Diritto, (2), 49-73.
Fineman, M. A. (2005). Feminist Legal Theory. Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 13(1), 13-23.
Fiorella, A. (2019). La codificazione penale in Italia e le sue prospettive di riforma. Archivio Penale, (2), 1-21.
Franciosi, G. (1983). Clan Gentilizio e strutture monogamiche. Contributo alla storia della famiglia romana. Napoli: Jovene.
Gatens, M. (1991). Feminism and Philosophy. Perspectives on Difference and Equality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gerhard, U. (1997). Femminismo e diritto: verso una concezione femminista e contestualizzata dell’eguaglianza. Ragion pratica, (8), 53–62.
Gianformaggio, L. (1993). Identity, Equality, Similarity, and the Law. Rechtsteorie, (15), 121-134.
Grant Bowman, C. and Schneider, E. M. (1998). Feminist Legal Theory, Feminist Lawmaking and the Legal Profession. Fordham Law Review, 67(2), 249–271.
Jaggar, A. M. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.
Jaramillo, I. C. (2009). La crítica feminista al derecho. In: R. Ávila Santamaría, et al. (eds.), El género en el derecho: ensayos críticos. Quito: V&M Gráficas.
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Contemporary Political Philosophy. An introduction (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198782742.003.0001
Lalor, K. (2022). Gender, Temporality and International Human Rights Law: From hidden histories to feminist futures. Bloomsbury, pp. 103-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509949939.ch-005
Lustig, A. (2014). Nei suoi occhi verdi. Rovereto: Keller, 2014.
Mackinnon, C. (2007). Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge: Harward University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrvck
Maine, H. S. (1998). Diritto antico [1861], Milan: Giuffrè.
Minow, M. (1988). Feminist Reason: Getting It and Losing It. Journal of Legal Education, 38(1), 47-60.
Monroy, B. (2012). Niente ci fu. Molfetta: La Meridiana.
Motta, R. (1979). Antropologia e storia del diritto in Paul Huvelin: un giusromanista alla corte di Emile Durkheim. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica.
Muyart de Vouglans, P. F. (1757). Institutes ou droit criminel ou príncipes généraux ser ces matières sui vant le droit civil, canonique et la jurisprudence duroy au me avec um traité particulier des crimes (tit. III, cap. 7, pp. 497-498). Paris: Breton.
Nicholson, L. (1997). The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.
Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.
Peristiany, J. G. (ed.). (1965). Honour and shame: the values of Mediterranean society. Chicago: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Phillips, A. (1998). Feminism and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198782063.001.0001
Pitch, T. (1995). L’antropologia dei diritti umani. In: Giasanti, A. and Maggioni, G. (eds.), I diritti nascosti. Approccio antropologico e prospettiva sociologica. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.
Pitt-Rivers, J. (1977). The Fate of Shechem, or the Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rouland, N. (1992). Antropologia giuridica. Milan: Giuffrè, 1992.
Sbano, N. (eds). (2004). Donne e diritti. Dalla sentenza Mortara del 1906 alla prima avvocata italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Schmitt, C. (1972). Le categorie del politico. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sciascia, L. (1986). 1912+1. Milano: Adelphi.
Severini, M. (2013). Dieci donne. Storia delle prime elettrici italiane (2nd ed.). Macerata: Liberilibri.
Shapiro, V. (1981). Research frontier essay: When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. The American Political Science Review, 75(3), 701-716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960962
Smart , C. (1992). The Woman of Legal Discourse. Social and Legal Studies, (1), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399200100103
Stagi, L. and Petti, G. (2015). Nel nome del padre. Paternità, conflitti e governo della famiglia neoliberale. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Stamile, N. (2016). Appunti su femminismo e teoria del diritto. Una rassegna. Ordines: per un sapere interdisciplinare delle istituzioni europee, (2), 301-329.
Stamile, N. (2020a). Para uma discussão crítica do Direito: o jusfeminismo. In: Aguilar Viana, A. C., et al. (Eds), Pesquisa, Gênero&Diversidade (vol. 2). Curitiba: Editora Íthala.
Stamile, N. (2020b). Igualdad, diferencia y teoría feminista. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, (18), 9-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2020.5261
Stamile, N. (2020c). Much to gain and much to lose (Commentary on the article by Torres Sánchez, Ximena.Gender Justice in the Judicial System: A Comparative Analysis of Women's Fundamental Right to Make Decisions About Their Own Bodies in Contexts of ViolenceInState Law Journal, Externado University of Colombia.No. 47, September-December 2020, pp. 177-213). In: Blog of the State Law Magazine, published on 11.12.2020. Available at: https://blogrevistaderechoestado.uexternado.edu.co/2020/12/11/mucho-para-ganar-y-mucho-para-perder/ (accessed on 29.06.2025).
Stamile, N. (2022). Direito e Gênero: desafios contemporâneos. Revista Brasileira de Direito, 18(3), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2022.v18i3.4750
Tacchi, F. (2009). Donne e professioni giuridiche in Italia dall’Unità ad oggi. Torino: UTET.
Tillich, P. (1969). Storia del pensiero cristiano. Roma: Astrolabio.
Torres, S. X. (2020). Justicia de género en el plano judicial. Análisis comparado sobre el derecho fundamental de la mujer a tomar decisiones sobre su propio cuerpo en el contexto de violencia. Revista Derecho del Estado, Universidad Externado de Colombia, (47), 177-213, https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n47.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n47.06
Valeriano, A. (2017). Malacarne. Donne e manicomio nell’Italia fascista. Rome: Donzelli editore.
Vigarello, G. (2001). Storia della violenza sessuale. Venezia: Marsilio.
Weiler, J. H. H. (2003). Un’Europa Cristiana. Un saggio esplorativo. Milan: Rizzoli.
Websites:
https://www.cortecostituzionale.it
https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1981/08/10/081U0442/sg
https://blogrevistaderechoestado.uexternado.edu.co/2020/12/11/mucho-para-ganar-y-mucho-para-perder/
Cases:
Italy, Court of Appeal of Ancona, III (25 July 1906), Giurisprudenza Italiana, 1906, III, 389ff.
Italy, Court of Cassation of Rome, No. 883 (15 December 1906), Giurisprudenza Italiana, 1907, III, 1ff; also in Foro Italiano, 1907, I, 73ff.
Italy, Constitutional Court, No. 64 (23 November 1961).
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bratislava Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
How to Cite
