Alternative Means for Resolving Administrative Disputes in Ukraine in the Light of European Integration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.323

Keywords:

Administrative Dispute, Administrative Justice, Conciliation of Parties, Mediation, Dispute Settlement with the Participation of the Judge

Abstract

This paper aims at the exploring the issues of the legal regulation of alternative means for administrative disputes resolution in Ukraine in frames of European integration. The importance of alternative dispute resolution in the field of administrative legal relations has been emphasised by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in a number of its recommendations. Alternative means have been introduced in administrative procedure and administrative justice in some European countries, including Ukraine. However, the ADR mechanisms in administrative legal relations still are not widely used primarily because of the lack of the clear legal regulation. In this paper, the core problems related to the use of alternative means for dispute resolution in administrative procedure and administrative justice have been identified and recommendations on enhancement of legal regulation of certain instruments in Ukraine have been provided based on the European approaches and the best practices of the selected states – members of the Council of Europe.

Author Biography

  • Yuliia Vashchenko, Comenius University Bratislava

    Department of Administrative Law and Environmental Law
    Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Law
    Šafárikovo námestie č. 6, P. O. BOX 313
    810 00 Bratislava
    Slovak Republic
    yuliia.vashchenko@uniba.sk

References

Arakelian, R. (2019). The introduction of the institute of mediation in criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine. – Qualification scientific work as the manuscript. Irpin, 2019. Available at: https://www.nusta.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/%D0%90%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Kavalnė, S., Saudargaitė, I. (2011). Mediation in Disputes between Public Authorities and Private Parties: Comparative Aspects. Jurisprudencija/Jurisprudence, 2011, 18(1), p. 251–265. Available at: https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/633 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Kovač, P. (2016). Challenges of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Administrative Relations in a Slovenian and Wider Context. Zbornik znanstvenih razprav, 76, pp. 69-98, http://doi.org/10.23666/zzr201603

Ladychenko, V., Golovko, L. (2017). Implementation of European Environmental Policy in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2017, 6, 3, 333-339, https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n3p333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n3p333

Litvins, G. (2019). Mediācijas attīstības virzieni un perspektīvas [Directions and Perspectives of Mediation Development]. Available at: https://www.apgads.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/apgads/PDF/Juridiskas-konferences/LUJFZK-7-2019/iscflul-7_2019_Ties-zin-uzd-noz-nak_23.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Molitoris, P. (2016a). Správny súdny poriadok a možnosti alternatívneho riešenia sporov [Administrative Law Procedures and Alternative Dispute Settlement]. Právník, 11/2016, 982-998.

Molitoris, P. (2016b). Konsenzuálne prostriedky alternatívneho riešenia sporov v správnom konaní [Consensual means for alternative disputes resolution in administrative proceedings]. Košice : Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach.

Preston, B. J. (2011). The use of alternative dispute resolution in administrative disputes. Available at: https://lec.nsw.gov.au/documents/speeches-and-papers/preston_use%20of%20alternative%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20administrative%20disputes.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Tsurtsumia, S. (2021). Mediation in Administrative Disputes. International Journal of law: “Law and World”, August 2021 (No18), 7(3), pp. 141-151, https://doi.org/10.36475/7.3.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36475/7.3.9

Tvaronavičienė, A., Kaminskienė, N., Rone, D., and Uudeküll, R. (2022). Mediation in the Baltic States: developments and challenges of implementation. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(4), 68-86, https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000427

Vačoková, L. (2020). Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for consumer disputes in the Slovak republic. Studia commercialia Bratislavensia, 13(3), 78-89. Available at: https://scb.euba.sk/index.php/blog-6/129-lenka-vacokova (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Vrabko, M. et al. (2018). Správne právo hmotné. Všeobecná časť. 2 vydanie [Administrative substantive law. General part. 2nd edition]. Bratislava: C. H. Beck.

Vrabko, M. et al. (2019). Správne právo procesné. Všeobecná časť. 2 vydanie [Administrative procedural law. General part. 2nd edition]. Bratislava: C. H. Beck.

Лазебний, Л. (2021). Медіація vs врегулювання спору за участю судді [Lazebny, L. (2021). Mediation vs dispute settlement with the participation of the judge]. Юридична газета, 29 вересня 2021. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/mediaciya-vs-vregulyuvannya-sporu-za-uchastyu-suddi.html (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Administrative Justice in Europe – Romania Report. Available at: https://www.aca-europe.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/romania/romania_en.pdf (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Administrative Procedure Act of the Republic of Latvia. Available at: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/55567-administrative-procedure-law (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Available at: https://www.urso.gov.sk/alternative-dispute-resolution-adr/ (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Code de justice administrative. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGISCTA000033424088 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Code of Administrative Court Procedure of the Republic of Estonia (passed 27.01.2011). Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/512122017007/consolide (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Conciliation Act (passed on 18.11.2009). Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/530102013028/consolide (accessed on 20.09.2023).

European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) (2019). Principles on the Protection and Promotion of the Ombudsman Institution (“The Venice Principles) adopted by the Venice Commission at its 118th Plenary Session (Venice, 15-16 March 2019). Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2019)005-e (accessed on 20.09.2023).

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2018). Working Group on Mediation (CEPEJ-GT-MED). The Impact of CEPEJ Guidelines on Civil, Family, Penal and Administrative Mediation of 16 May 2018. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/report-on-the-impact-of-cepej-guidelines-on-civil-family-penal-nd-admi/16808c400e (accessed on 20.09.2023).

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2007). Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing Recommendation on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties (7 December 2007). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680747683 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Judgement of the Supreme Court in case No160/12705/19 of 01 February 2022. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103027454 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Judgement of the Supreme Court in case No640/16646/21 of 12 July 2022. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103944034 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Law on Mediation of the Republic of Lithuania. Available at: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.325294/asr (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Mediation Law of the Republic of Latvia of 22 May 2014. Available at: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/266615-mediation-law (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Recommendation No R (81) 7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Measures Facilitating Access to Justice (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 May 1981 at its 68th Session). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168050e7e4 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Recommendation No R (86) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States concerning measures to prevent and reduce the excessive workload in the courts adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 September 1986 at the 399th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016804f7b86 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to Member States on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties Rec (2001) 9 adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 September 2001 at the 762nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16805e2b59 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Ruling of the Supreme Court in case No9901/898/18 of 13 June 2019. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103944034 (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Správny súdny poriadok (z 21. mája 2015). Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2015/162/ (accessed on 20.09.2023).

The Law on Proceedings before administrative courts of 30th August 2002. (Dziennik Ustaw of 2018, item 1302 – consolidated text).

Zákon č. 420/2004 Z.z. od 25.06.2004 O mediácii a o doplnení niektorých zákonov. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2004/420/ (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Zákon č. 71/1967 Zb. O správnom konaní (správný poriadok) (1967). Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/1967/71/ (accessed on 20.09.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00431672.1967.9941092

Закон України «Про адміністративну процедуру» від 17.02.2022 №2073-IX. Голос України, 15.06.2022 №123 [Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure” of 17.02.2022 No2073-IX. Golos Ukrajiny, 15.06.2022 No123]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2073-20#Text (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Закон України «Про медіацію» від 16.11.2021 №1875-IX. Відомості Верховної Ради, 2022, №7, ст. 51 [Law of Ukraine “On Mediation” of 16.11.2021 No1875-IX. Vidomosti Verkhovnoji Rady, 2022, No7, Art. 51]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1875-20#Text (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Інститут врегулювання спору за участю судді потребує вдосконалення (2019) [The Institution of Dispute Settlement with the Participation of the Judge Requires Enhancement (2019)]. Available at: https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/140687-institut-vregulyuvannya-sporu-za-uchastyu-suddi-potrebuye-vdoskonalennya (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Кодекс адміністративного судочинства України від 6 липня 2005 №2747-IV. Відомості Верховної Ради України, 2005, №35-36, №37, ст. 446 [Code on Administrative Judicial Proceedings of Ukraine of 6 July 2005 No2747-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoji Rady, 2005, No35-36, No37, Art. 446]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15/ed20170803#Text (accessed on 20.09.2023).

Конституція України від 28.06.1996 [Constitution of Ukraine of 28.06.1996]. Відомості Верховної Ради України (ВВР), 1996, No30, Art. 141.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2023

Issue

Section

Discussion Papers

Categories

How to Cite

Alternative Means for Resolving Administrative Disputes in Ukraine in the Light of European Integration. (2023). Bratislava Law Review, 7(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2023.7.2.323

Similar Articles

11-20 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.