Justice and digitalization as mutually determining factors of criminal-jurisdictional activity development

Oleg Stepanov; Denis Pechegin; Mariia Dolova; Alexander Trefilov

doi:10.46282/blr.2019.3.2.147

Authors

Oleg A. Stepanov The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-580X
Denis A. Pechegin The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-9966
Mariia O. Dolova The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-0981
Alexander A. Trefilov The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2019.3.2.147

Keywords:

justice, digitalization, criminal law, procedure, criminal-jurisdictional activity

Abstract

The introduction of digital technologies has an impact on various aspects of criminaljurisdictional activity, optimizes the decision-making process based on data collection, coordination of actions of law enforcement officers, increases the effectiveness of their actions by minimizing the human factor in the process of legal decision-making through the use of the potential of artificial neural networks. On the basis of dialectical-materialist method and special legal research methods it is noted that the relationship between the concepts of “digital justice” and “justice” can be represented in the form of basic characteristics of the development of the same socially significant process, a key element of which is the use of robotic programs that simplify and accelerate human activities. It is pointed out that in the process of building in our society a fair legal basis of statehood, moral and legal culture as an integral attribute and a distinctive feature of the progressive development of the state is becoming increasingly important and of practical importance. The purpose of the article is to analyse the approaches and problems related to the Justice within the modern digital developments.

References

ADILOV, Z.A. The role of law enforcement agencies in providing a favorable socio-psychological climate in the process of crime prevention. In The modern scientist, № 5, 2017, p. 404-407.

AGARKOV, A.F. Criminological review of crimes within the street. In The modern scientist, № 5, 2017, p. 442-446.

ALETRAS, N., TSARAPATSANIS, D., PREOŢIUC-PIETRO, D., LAMPOS, V. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. In PeerJ Computer Science 2: e93, 2016.

Justice in modern world, edited by V.M. LEBEDEV and T.Y. KHABRIEVA. Мoscow, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93

CORALLES M., FENWICK M., FORGO N. Robotics, AI and the Future of Law // Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9

HOLDER C., KHURANA V., HARRISON F., JACOBS L. Robotics and law: Key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II) // Computer law & security review. 32 (2016). p. 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.03.001

KAMERGEROV, A.F. On some problems of increasing the legal culture of employees of law enforcement agencies. In The modern scientist, № 4, 2017, p. 209-213.

KEVIN D. ASHLEY Artificial intelligence and legal analytics. Cambridge University Press, 2017, p. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761380

KHABRIEVA, T. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. In Journal of Russian Law, № 9, 2018, p. 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_9_1

KHABRIEVA, T., CHERNOGOR, N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. In Journal of Russian Law, № 1, 2018, p. 85-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/art_2018_1_7

NAGOEVA, A.V. Systematism in the Criminal Legislation of the Russian Federation. In The Modern Scientist, № 1, 2018, p. 113-117.

NIILER, E. Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So. [online]. Available at <https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/> [q. 2019-12-18].

TAYLOVA, A.G., ADZIEVA, S.М. The role of the prosecutor's office in the formation of legal consciousness. In The modern scientist, № 7, 2017, p. 261-265.

WYSS, M., Öffentlichkeit von Gerichtsverfahren und Fernsehberichterstattung, Überlegungen zu einem grundrechtlichen Spannungsverhältniss unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der schweizerischen Rechtslage. In EuGRZ, № 23, 1996.