The free movement of economically inactive EU citizens: The right to reside test

Laura Gyeney

doi:10.46282/blr.2019.3.1.125

Authors

Laura Gyeney Péter Pázmány Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2019.3.1.125

Keywords:

free movement, union citizenship, economically inactive citizens, social assistance, social security, solidarity, principle of proportionality

Abstract

The question of free movement rights of economically inactive citizens and their access to social assistance is a legally controversial and a politically sensitive issue. This is well illustrated by the CJEU’s recent case law which signals a shift in its former jurisprudence towards a more restrictive approach relating to access to social assistance benefits for economically inactive EU citizens. Moreover, the Court’s case law appears to be moving away from the concept of EU citizenship as a general value and common solidarity. The present article aims to give a brief overview of the relevant case law with the aim of seeking answer the question whether this turn in the CJEU’s case law predicts a real paradigm shift or just a consolidation phase in the Court’s jurisprudence.

References

GUILD, E., ROTAECHE, C. G., KOSTAKOPOULOU, D. (ed): The reconceptualization of European Union citizenship. Leiden, Boston : Brill publisher, 2014, p.149-166. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251526

KRAMER, D. Short-term residence, social benefits and the family, an analysis of case C-299/14 (Garcia Nieto and others). Available at <https://europeanlawblog.eu/tag/c-29914-garcia-nieto-and-others/> [q.2018-09-12].

MANTU, S., MINDERHOUD, P. Solidarity (still) in the making or bridge too far? In Nijmegen Migration Law Working Papers Series. Vol.1 (2015), p. 1-28.

MINDERHOUD, P., MANTU, S. Access to social assistance. In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 191-208. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-010

O’ BRIEN, C. R. The ECJ sacrifices EU citizenship in vain: Commission v UK. Case C-308/14 Commission v UK Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 June 2016 EU:C:2016:43. In Common Market Law Review. Vol. 54, No.1 (2017), p. 209-244.

PEERS, S. Don’t think of the children! CJEU approves automatic exclusions from family benefits in Case C-308/14 Commission v UK. Available at <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/06/dont-think-of-children-cjeu-approves.html> [q.2018-09-12]

PEREZ, A. M., FUEMTES, F.J.M. Dealing with loopholes in national and EU citizenship. In GUILD, E. ROTAECHE, C. G., RECCHI, E. Cross- state mobility in the EU. In European Societies. Vol.10, No.2 (2008), p. 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701835287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701835287

RECCHI, E. The engine of Europeanness? In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 135- 148. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-007

SADL, U., SANKARI, S. Why did the Citizenship Jurisprudence Change? In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 89-110. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-005

STRUMIA, F. Chronicles of a Troubled Narrative. In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 149-170. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-008

THYM, D. The judicial deconstruction of Union citizenship. In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-001

THYM, D. The elusive limit of solidarity: residence rights of and social benefits for economically inactive Union Citizens. In Common Market Law Review. Vol. 52, No.1 (2017), p.17-50.

THYM, D. The Evolution of Citizens’ Rights in Light of the European Union’s Constitutional Development. In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 111-134. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-006

THYM, D. Legal framework for EU immigration policy. In HAILBRONNER, K., THYM, D. (ed.): EU Immigration and Asylum Law. Commentary, 2nd edition. München, Oxford, Baden Baden : C.H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259208-1024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259208-1024

VERSCHUEREN, H. Preventing benefit tourism in the EU. A narrow or broad interpretation of the possibilities offered by the ECJ in Dano? In Common Market Law Review, Vol. 52, No.2 (2015), p. 363-390.

VERSCHUEREN, H. Free movement of benefit tourism. The Unreasonable burden of Brey. In European Journal of Migration and Law. Vol.16, No.2 (2016), p. 147-179. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342052

VERSCHUEREN, H. Economically inactive migrant Union citizens: only entitled to social benefits if they enjoy a right to reside in the host State. In European Journal of Social Security. Vol.19, No.1 (2017), p.71-82.

WOLLENSCHLAGER, F. Consolidating union citizenship: residence and solidarity rights for jobseekers and the economically inactive in the post-Dano era. In THYM, D. (ed): Questioning EU citizenship. Judges and the limits of free movement and solidarity in the EU. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2017, p. 171-190. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678.ch-009