ECtHR: Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland (Application No. 53600/20, 9 April 2024)

Insufficient Measures to Combat Climate Change Resulting in Violation of Human Rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.874

Keywords:

Climate Change, ECtHR, Human Rights, Living Instrument, Positive Obligation, Actio Popularis, Climate Litigation

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the analysis of the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights in which the Court has, for the first time, ruled on human rights violation due to climate change. It begins with the description of the convention as a so-called living instrument that aims at the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights taking into account the current social circumstances and challenges, such as the growing need for environmental protection and addressing climate change. In the judgment in question, the Court held that Switzerland had violated the applicant's rights due to insufficient legislative measures to protect individuals from the adverse effects of climate change. As a result of the long-awaited but unconventional conclusion, the judgment has become the target of much criticism. The paper thus concentrates on the main seemingly innovative or rather surprising pillars of the judgment, such as the court's determination of locus standi, the scope of a state's positive obligations in the context of climate change and its related margin of appreciation, as well as the unprecedented consideration of scientific evidence. The paper concludes by summarising the possible implications of the court's arguments for similar future cases, which will undoubtedly increase in number.

Author Biographies

Sandra Žatková, Comenius University Bratislava

Assistant Professor
Faculty of Law
Department of International Law and International Relations
Šafárikovo nám. 6
810 00 Bratislava, Slovakia
sandra.zatkova@flaw.uniba.sk

Petra Paľuchová, Comenius University Bratislava

PhD. Student
Faculty of Law
Department of International Law and International Relations
Šafárikovo nám. 6
810 00 Bratislava, Slovakia
petra.paluchova@flaw.uniba.sk

References

Ahmadov, F. T. (2018). The Right of Actio Popularis before International Courts and Tribunals. Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380981

Braig, K. F. and Panov, S. (2020). The Doctrine of Positive Obligations as a Starting Point for Climate Litigation in Strasbourg: The European Court of Human Rights as a Hilfssheriff in Combating Climate Change?. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 35, 261–298, https://core.ac.uk/reader/359918610

Bruce, S. (2017). The Project for an International Environmental Court. In: Tomuschat, C., Mazzeschi, R. P. and Thürer, D. (eds.), Conciliation in International Law (pp. 133–170). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312111_011

De Spiegeleir, A. and Brucher, A. (2023). Climate Docket and the Future in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Climate Law. A Sabin Center Blog, published on 20 March 2023. Available at: https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2023/03/20/climate-docket-and-the-future-in-the-case-law-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/ (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Dupuy, P. and Viñuales, J. E. (2015). International environmental law. Cambridge: University Printing House.

Jorio, L. (2023). From court cases to the ballot box, climate change will take centre stage in 2023. SWI swissinfo.ch, published on 20 January 2023. Available at: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-tech/from-court-cases-to-the-ballot-box-climate-change-will-take-centre-stage-in-2023/48202728 (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Jorio, L. (2024). Effects of 1.5°C global warming in Switzerland and beyond. SWI swissinfo.ch, published on 7 February 2024. Available at: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-&-tech/effects-of-1-5-c-global-warming-in-switzerland-and-beyond/49190170#:~:text=In%20Switzerland%2C%20the%201.5%C2%B0,Office%20of%20Meteorology%20and%20Climatology (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Nolan, A. (2024). Inter-generational Equity, Future Generations and Democracy in the European Court of Human Rights’ Klimaseniorinnen Decision. EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, published on 15 April 2024. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/inter-generational-equity-future-generations-and-democracy-in-the-european-court-of-human-rights-klimaseniorinnen-decision/ (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Pedersen, O. W. (2024). Climate Change and the ECHR: The Results Are In. EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, published on 11 April 2024. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/climate-change-and-the-echr-the-results-are-in/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0CSOZKrmbRx4CSdEXlB65Pt7iCMFjhc0PLH1awj4yLikybeXTgHdV7DqY_aem_Ae_TQ8-gnaB5q9ABYFRR4kAepe7qEeoeH6_8ZLIuEN1b2cSkHAGk50vby9O4e_hSgSIF1VPF_ctFg54iKMibzCGl (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Peel, J. and Lin, J. (2019). Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South. American Journal of International Law, 113(4), 679–726, https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48

Saucy, A. et al. (2021). The role of extreme temperature in cause-specific acute cardiovascular mortality in Switzerland: A case-crossover study. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 790, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147958

Schröder, F. R. (2021). Future Generations and the Environment: A Right to Intergenerational Equity under International Law?. Pretoria Student Law Review, 15(1), 165–195, https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v15i1.3666

Sicilianos, L. A. (2020). Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Remarks on the Court’s Approach. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/interpretation-of-the-european-convention-on-human-rights-remarks-on-t/1680a05732 (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Silverman-Roati, K. and Bönnemann. M. (2024). The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Climate Change. Verfassungsblog on matters constitutional, published on 22 May 2024. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-itlos-advisory-opinion-on-climate-change/ (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Tiryaki, S. (2023). Klimatický utečenec, klimatický migrant, či vnútorný vysídlenec? [Climate refugee, climate migrant or internally displaced person?]. Paneurópske právnické listy, VI(1), available at: https://www.paneuropskepravnickelisty.sk/index.php/2023/06/14/tiryaki-s/ (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M. et al. (2021). The burden of heat-related mortality attributable to recent human-induced climate change. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 11, 492–500, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x

Weiss, E. B. (2008). Climate Change, Intergenerational Equity, and International Law. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 9, 615–627, available at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2637&context=facpub (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Wentz, J. A. and Burger, M. (2015). Designing a Climate Change Displacement Coordination Facility: Key Issues for COP 21. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Columbia Law School, September 2015. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climate_change/123/ (accessed on 28.06.2024).

European Court of Human Rights (2020). The Convention as a Living Instrument at 70. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Seminar_background_paper_2020_ENG (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Human rights league (2024). Klimatickí migranti – fakty a pojmy [Climate migrants - facts and notions]. Available at: https://www.hrl.sk/sk/o-nas/aktuality/klimaticki-migranti-%E2%80%93-fakty-a-pojmy (accessed on 28.06.2024).

Institute for Economics & Peace (2020). Over one billion people at threat of being displaced by 2050 due to environmental change, conflict and civil unrest. London: Institute for Economics & Peace. Available at: https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ecological-Threat-Register-Press-Release-27.08-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 28.06.2024).

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at: https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6/wg2/IPCC_AR6_WGII_FullReport.pdf (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Klimatická žaloba ČR. Skupinová žaloba na českou vládu (2021). Klimatická žaloba ČR. Available at: https://www.klimazaloba.cz/soudni-dokumenty/ (accessed on 19.05.2024).

Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’).

United Nations Environment Programme (2019). Environmental Rule of Law: First Global Report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27279/Environmental_rule_of_law.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 19.05.2024).

United Nations Environment Programme (2023). Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/43008/global_climate_litigation_report_2023.pdf?sequence=3 (accessed on 19.05.2024).

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992).

United Nations General Assembly. 41/21. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 12 July 2019. A/HRC/RES/41/21, 2019.

United Nations General Assembly. 10/61. Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights. A/HRC/10/61, 2009.

ECtHR, Tyrer v. United Kingdom, app. no. 5856/72, 25 April 1978.

ECtHR, López Ostra v. Spain, app. no. 16798/90, 9 December 1994.

ECtHR, Guerra and Others v. Italy, (GC), app. no. 14967/89, 19 February 1998.

ECtHR, Asselbourg and Others v. Luxembourg, app. no. 29121/95, 29 June 1999.

ECtHR, Hatton and Others v. United Kingdom, (GC), app. no. 36022/97, 8 July 2003.

ECtHR, Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, app. no. 62543/00, 27 April 2004.

ECtHR, Taşkin and Others v. Turkey, app. no. 46117/99, 10 November 2004.

ECtHR, Öneryildiz v. Turkey, (GC), app. no. 48939/99, 30 November 2004.

ECtHR, Fadeyeva v. Russia, app. no. 55723/00, 9 June 2005.

ECtHR, Budayeva v. Russia, app. no. 15339/02, 11673/02, 15343/02, 20058/02 and 21166/02, 20 March 2008.

ECtHR, Oluic v. Croatia, app. no. 61260/08, 20 May 2010.

ECtHR, Di Sarno and Others v. Italy, app. no. 30765/08, 10 January 2012.

ECtHR, Aksu v. Turkey, (GC), app. no. 4149/04 and 41029/04, 15 March 2012.

ECtHR, Howald Moor v. Switzerland, app. no. 52067/10 and 41072/11, 11 March 2014.

ECtHR, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania, (GC), app. no. 47848/08, 17 July 2014.

ECtHR, Mansur Yalçın and Others v. Turkey, app. no. 21163/11, 16 September 2014.

ECtHR, Zakharov v. Russia, (GC), app. no. 47143/06, 4 December 2015.

ECtHR, Albert and Others v. Hungary, (GC), app. no. 5294/14, 7 July 2020.

ECtHR, Yusufeli İlçesini Güzelleştirme Yaşatma Kültür Varlıklarını Koruma Derneği v. Turkey, app. no. 37857/14, 7 December 2021.

ECtHR, Carême v. France, (GC), app. no. 7189/21, 9 April 2024.

ECtHR, Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Others, (GC), app. no. 39371/20, 9 April 2024.

ECtHR, Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, (GC), app. no. 53600/20, 9 April 2024.

Federal Supreme Court [of Switzerland], Public Law Division I, Judgment 1C_37/2019 of 5 May 2020.

Held v. Montana, No. CDV-2020-307 (Mont. 1st Dist. Ct.) (14 Aug. 2023).

Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell plc., The Hague District Court, C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19-379, 25 April 2022.

Neubauer, et al. v. Germany, Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 29 April 2021.

Partly Concurring Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Eicke. In: ECtHR, Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, (GC), app. no. 53600/20, 9 April 2024.

PSB et al. v. Brazil (on Climate Fund), Federal Supreme Court of Brazil, ADPF 708, 1 July 2022.

State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007, 20 December 2019.

Downloads

Published

07-07-2024

How to Cite

Žatková, S., & Paľuchová, P. (2024). ECtHR: Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland (Application No. 53600/20, 9 April 2024): Insufficient Measures to Combat Climate Change Resulting in Violation of Human Rights. Bratislava Law Review, 8(1), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.874