Reflection of Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on Impartiality and Independence of National Courts in Context of the Right to a Fair Trial

Alla Demyda

doi:10.46282/blr.2021.5.1.228

Authors

Alla Demyda Comenius University in Bratislava https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-2838

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2021.5.1.228

Keywords:

Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights, case law, fair trial, impartiality, independence, legislative change, constitutional change, principles of justice, reform, disciplinary proceedings

Abstract

The article focuses on the principle of impartiality and independence of judiciary as a part of the right to a fair trial according to Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In particular, an account will be taken of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in matters of applications from national judges. The article considers the reflection of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the amendment of national legislations and the amendment of the provisions of the national constitutions regarding the principles of justice.

References

Literature and reference lists:

Action Plan No. CM (2016) 36 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 13. 04. 2016 on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806442b9 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Action Report No. DH-DD (2015) 754 of 02. 07. 2015 concerning the case of Harabin v. Slovakia (Application no. 58688/11). Available at: http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=DH-DD(2015)754E (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Berezhanskyi, G. (2017). Properties of understanding the right to a fair trial. Criminal Justice Review, (3), 191-196.

Centre of Policy and Legal Reforms (2020). Analysis of the progress of Ukraine in implementing the Volkov group of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights for the period of 2014-2020. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/analysis-of-the-execution-volkov-group-cases-ukr/1680a06971 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Council of Europe. Details of Treaty No.005: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/005 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights (2013). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a fair trial (civil limb). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680700aaf (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Decision No. CM/Del/Dec (2020) 1383/H46-26 of 29. 09. – 01. 10. 2020 concerning Oleksandr Volkov group v. Ukraine (Application No. 21722/11). Available at: http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=CM/Del/Dec(2020)1383/H46-26E (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Entin, M. (2003). Fair Trial in Council of Europe and European Union Law. Constitutional Law. Eastern European Review, 44 (3), 85-97.

European Charter on the Statute for Judges of 08-10 December 1998. Available at: https://zdruzenie.sk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1_europska_charta_statutu_sudcov_a_dovodova_sprava.pdf (accessed on 15.05.2021).

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) (2019). Opinion CDL-AD (2019) 027-e on the Legal Framework in Ukraine Governing the Supreme Court and Judicial Self-Governing Bodies, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019). Available at: https://venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)027-e (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Kmec, J. (2020). Nezávislost soudní moci ve světle Evropské úmluvy o lidských právech [Independence of the judiciary in regard to the European Convention on Human Rights]. In: Šimíček, V. (ed.), Nezávislost soudní moci [Independence of the judiciary] (pp. 49-76). Praha: Leges.

Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) of 17.11.2010. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/magna-carta-slovakia/168063e446 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Opinion No. 18 (2015) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the position of the judiciary and its relation with the other powers of state in a modern democracy. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16807481a1 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Recommendation No. (94) 12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 13 October 1994 on the independence, competence and status of judges. Available at: https://zdruzenie.sk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/odporucanie_re_o_nezavislosti_sudcov_94_12.pdf (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Recommendation No. CM/Rec (2010) 12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 17 November 2010 on judges: independence, efficiency and accountability. Available at: https://zdruzenie.sk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/4_odporucanie_rady_ministrov_12_2010.pdf (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Statement No. 1 (2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on standards relating to the independence of justice and the non-transferability of judge’s. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/stanovisko-c-1-2001-poradnej-rady-europskych-sudcov-ccje-do-pozornosti/168044ba5b (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Statement No. 3 (2002) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the principles and rules governing judicial conduct, in particular in the fields of ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/stanovisko-c-3-poradnej-rady-europskych-sudcov-ccje-do-pozornosti-vybo/168044baa5 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Statement No. 17 (2014) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the evaluation of the work of judges, the quality of justice and respect for judicial independence. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/ccje-2014-opinion-no17-sk/16809ec9cd (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Svák, J. (2021). Ako môžu “čachre-machre“ pri výbere sudcov porušiť právo na zákonom zriadený súd [How can chachre-machre violate the right to a court established by law in the selection of judges]. Justičná revue, (2), 253-259.

UN (1985). The basic principles of judicial power independence. UN document no. A/COF.121/22/Rev. 1 59 (1985). Available at: http://www.sudcovia.sk/sk/dokumenty/legislativa/326-osn-rez-o-nezsud85 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Legislation:

Act No. 1188-VII of Ukraine of 8 April 2014 on restoring confidence in the judiciary in Ukraine, as amended. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1188-18#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 192-VIII of Ukraine of 12 December 2015 on ensuring the right to a fair trial, as amended. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/192-19#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 1401-VIII of Ukraine of 2 June 2016 amending the Constitution of Ukraine (concerning justice). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1401-19#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 1402-VIII of Ukraine of 2 June 2016 on the judiciary and the status of judges, as amended. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 1798-VIII of Ukraine of 21 December 2016 on the High Council for Justice, as amended. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-19#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 193-IX of Ukraine of 16. October 2019 on amendments to the Act of Ukraine on the Judiciary and the Status of Judges and certain Acts of Ukraine on the Activities of Judicial Self-Government Bodies. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/193-20#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Act No. 314/2018 of 24. 10. 2018 on the Constitutional Court of Slovakia and on amendments to certain acts. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2018/314/20210101 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Constitutional Act No. 161/2014 of 04. 06. 2014 amending the Constitution of Slovakia no. 460/1992 as amended. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2014/161 (accessed on 15.05.2021).

Court decisions:

ECtHR, Baka against Hungary, app. No. 20261/12, 23 June 2016.

ECtHR, Corneliu Birsan and Gabriela Victoria Birsan v. Romania, app. No. 79917/13, 2 February 2016.

ECtHR, Denisov v. Ukraine, app. No. 76639/11, 25 September 2018.

ECtHR, Ermenyi v. Hungary, app. No. 22254/14, 22 November 2016.

ECtHR, Guthmundur Andri Astrathsson v. Iceland, app. No. 26374/18, 12 March 2019.

ECtHR, Harabin v. Slovakia, app. No. 58688/11, 20 November 2012.

ECtHR, Kudeshkina v. Russia, app. No. 29492/05, 26 February 2009.

ECtHR, Kulykov and others v. Ukraine, app. No. 5114/09 and 17 others, 19 January 2017.

ECtHR, Mitrinovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, app. No. 6899/12, 30 April 2015.

ECtHR, Pope Blaga v. Romania, app. No. 37379/02, 27 November 2012.

ECtHR, Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sa v. Portugal, app. No. 55391/13, 57728/13 and 74041/13, 21 June 2016.

ECtHR, Shuvalov v. Estonia, app. No. 39820/08 and 14942/09, 29 May 2012.

ECtHR, Volkov v. Ukraine, app. No. 21722/11, 9 January 2013.

Ukraine, Constitutional Court of Ukraine, Case No. 1-304/2019 (7155/19), 11 March 2020. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v004p710-20#Text (accessed on 15.05.2021).