The Interaction Between Roman Ius Civile and Local Provincial Legal Tradition: Papyri P. Yadin 21 and P. Yadin 22 as Roman Stipulatio

Valéria Terézia Dančiaková

doi:10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.373

Authors

Valéria Terézia Dančiaková Comenius University Bratislava https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-0960

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.373

Keywords:

Roman law, Babatha Archive, stipulatio, P. Yadin 21, P. Yadin 22, Ius Civile

Abstract

When Babatha, a Jewish woman living in Maoza, conducted her legal affairs in the early second century CE, her homeland was already under the rule of the Romans as the province of Arabia Petraea. Although people were granted the right to use their original legal system, the situation with respect to legal disputes was not that straightforward. The nearest judiciary authority was the appointed Roman governor. Since Babatha was not a Roman citizen, in case of litigation, the governor would apply ius gentium, which was, in fact, more of an idea than a specific legal system. The Greek documents in the Archive are a precious testimony not only for the life of Babatha herself but also for how Roman dominion over various regions influenced how local legal affairs were conducted. The discussion continues relating the archive, whether traces of the Roman ius civile can be found in the papyri, and if so, what it means considering the law that was used in the provinces. The papyri P. Yadin 21 and P. Yadin 22 are presented as purchase and sale, which, however, poses a question as to what tradition lies behind the contract. In this article, we want to present how the Roman ius civile could possibly interact with local provincial legal tradition on the example of the papyri P. Yadin 21 and P. Yadin 22, comparing them to the Roman contracts, treating the possible use of stipulatio.

Author Biography

Valéria Terézia Dančiaková, Comenius University Bratislava

Faculty of Law
Department of Roman Law and Ecclesiastical Law
Šafárikovo nám. 6
818 00 Bratislava, Slovakia
valeria.terezia.danciakova@uniba.sk

References

Bělovský, P. (2002). Depositum irregulare: úschova peněz v římském právu. Právník, 141(9), pp. 981–996. ISSN 0231-6625.

Berger, A. (1980). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society. ISBN 9780871694355.

Broshi, M. (1992). Agriculture and Economy in Roman Palestine: Seven Notes on the Babatha Archive. Israel Exploration Journal, 42(3–4), pp. 230–240. ISSN 0021-2059.

Brtko, R. (2020). Kontroverzie medzi prokuliánmi a sabiniánmi. Levoča: MTM. ISBN 978-80-8215-017-2.

Chiusi, T. J. (2020). Legal of Interactions in the Archive Babatha: P. Yadin 21 and 22. In: Czajkowski, K. et al. (eds.). Law in the Roman Provinces (pp. 101–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198844082.

Cohen, B. (2018). Ususfructus in Jewish and Roman Law. In: Cohen, B. Jewish and Roman Law (Volume 2): A Comparative Study (pp. 557-577). Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463239930-006

Czajkowski, K. (2017). Localized Law: The Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777335.001.0001

duPlessis, P. J. (2020). Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198848011.

Ibbetson, D. (2015). Sources of the Law From the Republic to the Dominate. In: Johnston, D. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion To Roman Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89564-4.

Isaac, B. (1992). The Babatha Archive. A Review Article. Israel Exploration Journal, 42(1-2), pp. 62–75.

Johnston, D. (1999). Roman Law in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612138

Katzoff, R. (2007). “P. Yadin 21” and Rabbinic Law on Widow’s Rights. The Jewish Quarterly Review, 97(4), pp. 545–575. DOI: 10.1353/jqr.2007.0064

Lewis, N. (1994). The Babatha Archive: A response. Israel Exploration Journal, 44(3–4), pp. 243–246.

Liddell, H. G. and Scott., R. (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Nicholas, B. and Metzger, E. (2008). An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198760634.

Oudshoorn, J. G. (2007). The Relationship between Roman and Local Law in the Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives: General Analysis and Three Case Studies on Law of Succession, Guardianship and Marriage. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-14974-8.

Panczová, H. (2012). Grécko-slovenský slovník. Od Homéra po kresťanských autorov. Bratislava: Lingea. ISBN 9788081450211.

Pringsheim, F. (1950). The Greek Law of Sale. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.

Radzyner, A. P. (2005). Yadin 21-22: Sale or Lease? In: Katzoff, R., Schaps, D. (eds.). Law in the Documents of the Judean Dessert. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-47-40399-9.

Scott, R. B. Y. (1959). Weights and Measures of the Bible. The Biblical Archeologist, 22(2), pp. 21–40.

Sherwood, A. N. et al. (2020). Greek and Roman Technology: A Sourcebook of Translated Greek and Roman Texts. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138927896.

Smith, W. (1859). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

Taubenschlag, R. (1944). The Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri, 332 B.C.–A.D. 640. New York: Herald Square Press.

Zimmermann, R. (1992). The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town: Rustica Press LTD. ISBN 0-7021-2347-1.