Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.2.832Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Liability, Criminal Law, Punishment, EducationAbstract
Today's astonishing development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has marked the onset of a new era characterised by profound societal and legal changes. Among the numerous groundbreaking developments, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force, penetrating virtually every aspect of our daily existence. From the domains of commerce and industry to healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, AI technologies have become indispensable instruments shaping our interactions, professions, and our way of navigating the world. With its extraordinary capabilities and ever-expanding influence, AI serves as a testament to humanity's unwavering commitment to innovation and the limitless potential of technology to transform our society. While Artificial Intelligence systems can execute actions akin to those that could constitute criminal activities if carried out by humans, the challenge arises from the fact that crimes are typically defined within the framework of established laws. Consequently, it can be quite challenging to classify such AI-induced actions as criminal due to the absence of specific legal provisions. Nevertheless, criminal acts are characterised by the intent - or mens rea - behind it. In this context, the intricate issue of assigning criminal responsibility to AI, being a non-human entity, presents particularly complex theoretical challenges, above all its punishment. This paper aims to define AI and its interactions with criminal law, briefly reconstruct potential liability models for AI, deconstruct the aim of punishment in modern constitutional systems, and evaluate whether modern legal systems allow machines to be punished.
References
Abbott, R. and Sarch, A. F. (2019). Punishing artificial intelligence: Legal fiction or science fiction? UC Davis Law Review, 53(1), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3327485
Algeri, L. (2021). Intelligenza artificiale e polizia predittiva [Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing]. Diritto Penale e Processo, 2021(6), 724–734.
Asaro, P. (2012). A body to kick, but still no soul to damn: Legal perspectives on Robotics. In: Lin, P., Abney K. and Bekey, G. A. (ed.), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics (pp. 169–186). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Basile, F. (2019). Intelligenza artificiale e diritto penale [Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Law]. Diritto Penale e Uomo, 1–33. Available at: https://archiviodpc.dirittopenaleuomo.org/d/6821-intelligenza-artificiale-e-diritto-penale-quattro-possibili-percorsi-di-indagine (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Bassini, M., Liguori, L. and Pollicino, O. (2018). Sistemi di intelligenza artificiale, responsabilità e accountability [Artificial Intelligence Systems, Responsibility and Accountability]. In: Pizzetti, F. (Ed.), Intelligenza artificiale, protezione dei dati personali e regolazione (pp. 333–369). Torino: Giappichelli.
Berman, N. M. (2012). Introduction: punishment and culpability. Ohio State journal of criminal law, 9, 441–448.
Boden, M. A. (2018). Intelligenza artificiale [Artificial Intelligence]. In: Al-Khalili, J. (Ed.), Il futuro che verrà. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
Burda, E., Čentéš, J., Kolesár, J. and Záhora, J. (2010). Trestný zákon I. Všeobecná časť, komentár [Criminal Code I. General Part. Commentary]. Praha: C. H. Beck.
Butler, T. L. (1982). Can a Computer Be an Author: Copyright Aspects of Artistic Intelligence. Comment L.S, 4, 707–747.
Butz, M. V. (2021). Towards strong AI. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00705-x
Cadoppi, A. and Veneziani, P. (2004). Elementi di diritto penale – Parte generale (2nd ed.) [Elements of Criminal Law – General Part]. Padova: CEDAM.
Carrara, F. (1871). Programma del corso di diritto criminale. Parte generale [Syllabus of Course Criminal Law – General Part]. Lucca: Giusti.
Cattaneo, M. A. (1978). Il problema filosofico della pena [The philosophical problem of punishment]. Ferrara: Ed. Universitaria.
Ciappi, S. and Coluccia, A. (1997). Giustizia criminale [Criminal Justice]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Dressler, J. (2007). Cases and materials on criminal law. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing.
Fiandaca, G. and Musco, E. (2007). Diritto penale, Parte generale (5th ed.). Bologna: Zanichelli.
Floridi, L. (2019). What the near future of artificial intelligence could be. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00345-y
Gless, S., Silverman, E. and Weigend, D. (2016). If robots cause harm, who is to blame? Self-driving cars and criminal liability. New Criminal Law Review, 19(3), 412–436. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2016.19.3.412
Glover, E. (2022). Strong AI vs. weak AI: What’s the difference? Built In. Available at: https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/strong-ai-weak-ai (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Hallevy, G. (2010). The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entitiesfrom science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(2), 171–201.
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hodula, M. (2021). Criminal liability of self-driving vehicles. In: Bratislava Legal Forum 2021: Cybercrime in the time of crisis (pp. 8–14). Bratislava: Comenius University, Faculty of Law.
Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung [Prediction and Cognition: The Function of Anticipations in Human Behavior Control and Perception]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, Verlag für Psychologie.
Holbrook, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence: “Soft vs hard.” Medium, published on 21.07.2020. Available at: https://medium.com/hackguild/artificial-intelligence-soft-vs-hard-17b8e1c343d7 (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Kaplan, J. (2018). Intelligenza artificiale. Guida al futuro prossimo [Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to the Near Future]. Roma: Luiss University Press.
Kof, J. N., Bboers, E. J. W., Kosters, W. A., Putten, P. and Poel, M. (2002). Artificial intelligence: Definition, trends, techniques, and cases. In: Knowledge for sustainable development: An insight into the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (pp. 1095–1107). Paris: UNESCO; Oxford: EOLSS.
Lacey, N. and Wells, C. (1998). Reconstructing criminal law - Critical perspectives on crime and criminal process. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Lagioia, F. and Sartor, G. (2020). AI systems under criminal law: A legal analysis and a regulatory perspective. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 433–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00362-x
Minsky, M. (1967). Computation: Finite and infinite machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Moor, J. (2006). The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The next fifty years. AI Magazine, 27(4), 87–91, https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1911
Mulligan, C. (2018). Revenge against robots. South Carolina Law Review, 69(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3016048
Nicotra, I. (2014). Pena e reinserimento sociale ad un anno dalla sentenza Torregiani [Punishment and social reintegration one year after the Torregiani sentence]. Diritto penitenziario e costituzione. Available at: https://www.dirittopenitenziarioecostituzione.it/images/pdf/saggi/I_Nicotra_Pena_e_reinserimento_sociale.pdf (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Njoku, F. O. C. (2012). Hart on philosophical and legal conception of punishment. International journal of technology and reformed tradition, 4, 220–231.
Nuvolone, P. (1982). Pena (dir. pen.). In: Enciclopedia del diritto [Encyclopedy of Law] (Vol. XXXII, pp. 787–817). Milano: Giuffrè.
Oss, G. (2009). Certezza della pena e trattamenti rieducativi: Un contrasto insanabile? [Certainty of punishment and re-educational treatments: An irreconcilable contrast?]. Available at: http://www.ristretti.it/commenti/2010/gennaio/pdf2/giorgia_oss.pdf (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Padhy, N. P. (2005). Artificial intelligence and intelligent systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pervukhin, A. (2005). Deodands: A study in the creation of common law rules. American Journal of Legal History, 47(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/30039513
Piparo, C. (2023). Machina delinquere potest? A modern criminalization challenge due to lack of text. Text, context, and subtext in law. Timisoara: Universul Juridic, 900–909.
Pizzetti, F. (2018). Intelligenza artificiale: Passato, presente, futuro. In: Pizzetti, F. (Ed.), Intelligenza artificiale, protezione dei dati personali e regolazione. Torino: Giappichelli, 216–224.
Remeta, R. (2023). Principles of punishment in the light of the proposed changes. In: Bratislava Legal Forum 2023: Current challenges of criminal law (pp. 142–154). Bratislava: Comenius University, Faculty of Law.
Rockwell, A. (2017). The history of artificial intelligence. Harvard SITN, published on 28.08.2017. Available at: https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2011). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2011.01.005
Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, brains and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://rodsmith.nz/wp-content/uploads/Searle_1984_minds-brains-and-science.pdf (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Schank, R. C. (1987). What’s AI, Anyway?. IA Magazine, 8(4), 59–65.
Smejkal, V. (2023). Trestní odpovědnost za jednání robotů využívajících AI [Criminal Liability for the Actions of AI Robots]. In: Čentéš, J. et al (eds.), Bratislava Legal Forum 2023: Current challenges of criminal law (pp. 46–73). Bratislava: Comenius University, Faculty of Law.
Srstka, J. et al. (2024). Autorské právo a práva související [Copyright and related rights]. Praha: Leges.
Strémy, T. and Klátik, J. (2018). Alternatívne tresty [Alternative punishments]. Bratislava: C. H. Beck.
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computer machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Yaffe, G. (2012). The Voluntary Act Requirement. In: Marmor, A. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Routledge.
Walker, L. (2015). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end humanity. Newsweek, published on 14.05.2015. Available at: https://www.newsweek.com/stephen-hawking-warns-artificial-intelligence-could-end-humanity-332082 (accessed on 24.10.2024).
Act No. 300/2005 Slovak Coll., as amended.
Act No. 91/2016 Slovak Coll., as amended.
European Commission. (2018, December 18). A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. Brussels. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf (accessed on 24.10.2024).
European Parliament. (2017, February 16). European Parliament resolution providing recommendations to the European Commission on civil law rules on robotics [2015/2103(INL)].
Italian Constitution, ratified on 22 December 1947, as amended.
Resolution of the Government of the Slovak Republic No. 385/2000 on the legislative intent of the Criminal Code and the Criminal Code.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bratislava Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
How to Cite
