The Right to a Firm in the Legal Doctrine and Judicial Practice of the Russian Empire

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2025.9.2.1121

Keywords:

Right to a Firm, Commercial Name, Corporate Law, Competition law

Abstract

The article examines scientific, theoretical and practical approaches to the issue of the right to a firm in the law of the Russian Empire in the period from the 1880s to 1917. In pre-revolutionary law, doctrine and practice, the right to a firm was understood as the right of a merchant or industrialist to carry out entrepreneurial activity under a certain designation, called in commercial life “firm”. Both legal science and then judicial practice understood a firm as a trade (commercial) name. Unlike many Western countries, as well as the Far East (e.g., Japan), this concept was never codified, although such attempts were repeatedly made. The authors conclude that the doctrine that emerged during this period of time significantly outpaced the adoption of relevant legislation, and sometimes even the judicial practice. The treatises of such researchers as A. Bashilov (1887), G. Shershenevich (1888), A. Hol’msten (1895), Vs. Udintsev (1907), A. Fyodorov (1911), A. Kaminka (1912), and others were used as an analysis of the doctrine; the authors also conducted an analysis of a number of judgments of the 4th (later the Judicial department) of the Governing Senate on the issue of the right to a firm, as well as the judgments of some courts of the European states.

Author Biographies

  • Anatoliy Lytvynenko, Baltic International Academy

    Doctor of Legal Sciences, Researcher and lecturer 
    Valērijas Seiles iela 4
    LV-1003, Riga; Latvia
    anat.lytvynenko@gmail.com

  • Tetiana Petlina, University of Latvia

    Master in History, Master in Public Health
    Bachelor of Pharmacy
    Bachelor student at University of Latvia
    Riga 1st Medical College
    Tomsona iela 37
    LV-1013, Riga; Latvia
    tatyanapetlina15@gmail.com

References

Legal literature

Agarkov, M. M. (1915). Pravo na imya [Right to a name]. Pamyati professora Gabrіelya Feliksovicha Shershenevicha. In: Sbornik statej po grazhdanskomu i torgovomu pravu (pp. 71-92). Moskva: Izdanіe Br. Bashmakovyh [Moscow: Edition of the Bashmakovy Brothers].

Auschitzky, A. (1909). Le nom commercial [The commercial name]. Thèse pour le doctorat. Bordeaux: Y. Carodet, imprimeur de l’Université [Doctoral thesis. Bordeaux: Y. Carodet, printer of the University].

Bashilov, A. P. (1887). Russkoe torgovoe pravo [Russian trade law]. Vypusk pervyj. S.-Peterburg: Tipografiya A. S. Suvorina [First edition. Saint-Petersburg: Tyography of A. S. Suvorin].

Borovikovskij, A. (1888). Zakony Grazhdanskie. (Svod Zakonov Tom X chast’ I) s obyasnenіyami po rѣshenіyam Grazhdanskago Kassacіonnago Departamenta Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata [Civil laws (Restatement of laws, Volume X, part I, with the explanations upon the judgments of the Civil Cassation Department of the Governing Senate]. S-Peterburg: Tipografіya A. S. Suvorina [Saint-Petersburg: Typography of A. S. Suvorin].

Danilova, E. N. (1915). Firma i nazvanie predpriyatiya [The firm and name of the enterprise. Vѣstnik” grazhdanskago práva [Messenger of civil law], № 6, Oktyabr’ 1915 g., 72-107 [No. 6, October, 1915, 72-107].

Deshayes de Merville, L. (1883). Des effets de l’adoption et de l’abrogation en droit Romain / Du nom commercial en droit Français [On the effects of adoption and abrogation in Roman law / On the commercial name in French law]. Thèse pour le doctorat. Paris: Librairie nouvelle de droit et de jurisprudence. Arthur Rousseau, Éditeur [Doctoral thesis. Paris: New Library for law and jurisprudence. Arthur Rousseau, Editor].

Endemann, W. (1868). Das Deutsche Handelsrecht: systematisch dargestellt. Zweite verbesserte Auflage [German Trade Law: Systematically Presented. Second Revised Edition] Heidelberg: Verlag von Vangel & Schmitt [Heidelberg: Publishing House of Vangel & Schmitt].

Fyodorov, A. F. (1911). Torgovoe pravo [Trade law]. Odessa: «Slavyanskaya» tip. E. Hrisogelos [Odessa: Printing House «Slavyanskaya», E. Hrisogelos].

Haab, R. (1888). Beitrag zur Geschichte und Dogmatik der Handels-Firma [Contribution to the history and dogmatics of the trading firm]. Strassburg: Universitats-Buchdruckerei von J. H. Ed. Heitz (Heitz & Mundel) [Strasbourg: University Book Typography of J. H. Ed. Heitz (Heitz & Mundel)].

Grazhdanskoe Ulozhenіe (1910). Proekt Vysochajshe Utverzhdennoj Redakcіonnoj Kommisіi po sostavlenіyu Grazhdanskago Ulozhenіya [The Restatement of Civil Laws. The project of the Highest established Editing Commission on drafting the Restatement of Civil Laws]. Pod redakcіej I. M. Tyutryumova. Sostavil A. L. Saatchіan. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdanіe knizhnago magazina «Zakonovѣdenіe» [Under the edition of I. M. Tyutryumov. Compiled by A. L. Saatchian. Saint-Petersburg: issue of the book shop “Legal studies”].

Hahn, O. (1870). Das Handelsrecht nach dem allgemeinen deutschen Handelsgeseßbuch [Trade law according to the General German Code of Commerce]. Stuttgart: Verlag von Julius Maier [Stuttgart: Publishing House of Julius Maier].

Hessen, Ya. M. (1910). Ustav Torgovyj (T. XI ch. 1. Izd. 1903 g. po prodolzhenijam 1906 i 1908 g.) [Statute of Commerce (Vol. XI p. 1. Edition of 1903 g. with the continuation of 1906 and 1908)]. St.-Peterburg: Izdanije Yuridicheskago Knizhnago sklada «Pravo» [Saint-Petersburg: Edition of the Law Bookstore “Law”].

Hol’msten, A. H. (1895). Ocherki po russkomu torgovomu pravu. Vypusk pervyj.[Essays on Russian trade law. Issue One]. S.-Peterburg: Tipografiya D. Chichinadze [Saint-Petersburg: Typography of D. Chichinadze].

Kaminka, A. I. (1908). Torgovaya firma [Trading firm]. Pravo. Ezhenѣdel'naya yuridicheskaya gazeta [Law. Weekly legal newspaper] 1908 g. № 38, Voskresen’e 21 sentyabrya, 2022-2023 [1908, No. 38, Sunday, September 21, 2022-2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.19080210111

Kaminka A. I. (1912). Ocherki torgovago prava. Vypusk 1. Izdanie vtoroe, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe [Essays on trade law. Issue 1. Second edition, edited and supplemented] S.-Peterburg: Izdanie Yuridicheskago knizhnago sklada «Pravo» [Saint-Petersburg: Edition of the Law Bookstore “Law”].

Katkov, V. (1897). Pravo na imya [Right to a name]. Zhurnal Yuridicheskago Soobshchestva pri Imperatorskom S.-Peterburgskom Universitetѣ [The Journal of the Legal Society under the Emperor’s Saint-Petersburg University]. God Dvadcat’ Sed’moj. 1897. Vypusk 8., 47-62 [Year Twenty-Seven. 1897. Issue 8, 47-62].

Klotz, A. (1898). Du nom commercial en droit français [Commercial name in French law]. Thèse pour la doctorat. Paris: Cerf, Imprimeur-Éditeur [Doctoral thesis. Paris: Cerf, Printer-Editor].

Kohler, J. (1884). Das Recht des Markenschutzes mit Berucksichtigung Auslandischer Gesetzgebungen und mit besonderer Rucksicht auf die Englische, Anglo-Amerikanische, Franzosische, Belgische und Italienische Jurisprudenz [The law of trademark protection with consideration of foreign legislation and with particular regard to English, Anglo-American, French, Belgian and Italian jurisprudence] Wurzburg: Stahel’sche Verlags-Anstalt [Wurzburg: Publishing House of Stahel].

Kolumbus, P. (1882). Firmy po nashim torgovym zakonam [The firms under our trade laws]. Zhurnal Grazhdanskago i Ugolovnago Prava [Journal of Civil and Criminal Law]. God Dvenadcatyj. 1882. Kniga pervaya. Yanvar. S-Peterburg: Tipografіya Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata, 87-100 [Year Twelve. 1882. Book One. January. Saint-Petersburg: Typography of the Governing Senate, 87-100].

Lallier, J.-A. (1890). De la Propriété des noms et des titres: origine des noms et des titres [On the ownerships and titles: the origin of names and titles]. Paris: A. Giard, Libraire-Éditeur [Paris: A. Giard, Librarian-Editor].

Lévy, R. (1905). Le Nom commercial [The commercial name]. Thèse por le doctorat. Paris: Librairie de la Socièté du Recueil Général des lois et des arréts. L. Larose & L. Tenin, directeurs [Doctoral thesis. Paris: Library of the Society of “General Compilation of Laws and Judgments”. L. Larose & L. Tenin, directors].

Nevzorov, A. S. (1912). Posobie po izucheniyu torgovago prava. Izdanie vtoroe. Izdal M. S. Mihalevskij [Book on studying trade law. Second Edition. Printed by M.S. Mihalevskij] Yur’ev: Tipografiya Ed. Bergmana [Yurijev: Typography of Ed. Bergman].

Ocherk postanovlenіj zapadno-evropejskih zakonodatel’stv o torgovoj zapisi i o firmah. (1894). [Essay on the regulations of Western-European legislations on trade record and firms] Vѣstnik finansov, promyshlennosti i torgovli [Messenger of finance, industry and trade]. № 1, Yanvar’-fevral’-mart’ 1894, 27-32 [No. 1, January – February – March 1894, 27-32].

Oudinot, M. (1912). De la transmission de la firme en droit allemand [The transmission of a firm in German law]. Annales de droit commercial et industriel français, étranger et international (Année 1912). Paris: Librairie nouvelle de droit et de jurisprudence, 359-372 [Annals of commercial and industrial law of France, foreign and international (Year 1912). Paris: New Library of law and jurisprudence, 359-372].

Pollitzer, F. (1895). Das österreichische Handelsrecht. Systematisch dargestellt von Dr. Franz Pollitzer. Ein Leitfaden für Studierende. [Austrian Commercial Law. Systematically presented by Dr. Franz Pollitzer. A guide for students.] Wien: Manz'sche k.u.k. Hof-Verlags und Universitäts-Buchhandlung [Vienna: Manz Emperor’s and Royal Courtyard Publishing House and University Bookshop].

Pravo. Ezhenѣdel'naya yuridicheskaya gazeta [Law. Weekly legal newspaper]. 1911 g. № 21, Voskresen’e, 29 maya, 1239-1240 [Year 1911, No. 21, Sunday, May 29, 1239-1240].

Pustorosleva, P. (1890). Ustupka firmy [Cession of a firm]. Yuridicheskіj vѣstnik [Legal Messenger]. Noyabr’ 1890. Tom VI., 445-446 [November 1890. Volume VI., 445-446].

Regelsberger, F. (1897). Obshchee uchenіe o pravѣ. Perevod I. A. Bazanova, pod redakcіej prof. Yu. S. Gambarova [General study on law. Translation of I. A. Bazanov under the edition of prof Yu. S. Gambarov]. Moskva: Tipografіya Vysochajshe utverzhd. T-va I. D. Sytina [Moscow: Typography of the Established-by-Royal-Assent Society of D. Sytin].

Rogers, E. S. (1910). Some historical matter concerning trade-marks. Michigan Law Review, 9(1), 29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1276308

Rozenberg, V. V. (1914). Firma. Dogmaticheskіj ocherk [The firm. Dogmatic essay]. S.-Peterburg: Tip. red. perіod. izd. M-va F-v [Saint-Petersburg: Typography of the editorial office of the periodical issues of the Ministry of Finance].

Rzhondkovskіj, N. (1883). Zamѣchanіya na «Predvaritel'nyj proekt polozhenіya o torgovoj zapisi» [Comments on the “Preliminary project of the regulation on trade record”]. Yuridicheskіj Vѣstnik [Legal messenger]. № 11, Noyabr’ 1883 g., 442-492 [No. 11, November 1883, 442-492].

Shershenevich, G. F. (1888). Kurs torgovago prava. Tom I. Pravo material’noe [Course of trade law. Volume I. Substantive law] Kazan: Tipografiya Imperatorskago Universiteta [Kazan: Typography of the Emperor’s University].

Shreter, V. M. (1915). Nedobrosovѣstnaya konkurencіya [Unfair trade]. Pamyati professora Gabrіelya Feliksovicha Shershenevicha. In: Sbornik statej po grazhdanskomu i torgovomu pravu (pp. 426-455). Moskva: Izdanіe Br. Bashmakovyh [In memoriam of Gabriel’ Feliksovich Shershenevich. Compilation of articles on civil and commercial law (pp. 426-455). Moscow: Edition of the Bashmakovy Brothers].

Tsitovich, P. (1891). Uchebnik torgovago práva. Vypusk Pervyj [Textbook of trade law. Issue one] Kiev: Izdanie knigoprodavca N. Ya. Ogloblina [Kiev: Edition of N. Ya. Ogloblin, Bookseller].

Udincev, Vs. (1907). Russkoe torgovo-promyshlennoe pravo [Russian trade-industrial law]. Kіev: Tipografіya I. I. Chokolova [Kiev: Typography of I. I. Chokolov]

Hang, Y. Y. (1911). The Commercial Code of Japan. Boston: The Boston Book Company.

Yuridicheskij vѣstnik [Legal messenger]. 1891. Tom VII. Kniga pervaya (yanvar’) [1891. Volume VII. Book one (January)]

Legislation

Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten (1794), Th. 2, Tit. 8, § 621-622.

Bundesgesetz über das Obligationenrecht, vom 14. Juni 1881. Bbl 1881 III 109, Nr. 26.

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Deutschland) vom 18. August 1896, RGBl. 1896, Nr. 21, p. 195 – ff.

Handelsgesetzbuch (Deutschland), vom 10. Mai 1897, RGBl. 1897, Nr. 23, p. 219 – ff.

Kereskedelmi törvénykönyv (Magyarország). 1875-ik evi orszaggyülesi Törvenyczikkek. Budapest: Kiadja Rath Mor, 1875, p. 223.

Loi du 28 juillet 1824 relative aux altérations ou suppositions de noms sur les produits fabriqués. Schmoll, I. (1879) Traité pratique des brevets d’invention: dessins modèles et marques de fabrique, noms commerciaux, enseigenes, et autres designations d'etablissements et produits industriels comprenant la législation ètrangrée et les traités internationaux. Troisiéme édition. Paris: Librairie Polytechnique de J. Baudry, p. 166.

Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch vom 10. Dezember 1907, AS 24, 233.

Case law

A Királyi Curia, 1913 április 29. 734/912. v. sz. a. IV. p.t. Gallia Béla (szerk.): Hiteljogi döntvénytár. (váltó-, csőd-, kereskedelmi és tőzsdei ügyekben) VII. kötet. Budapest: Franklin Társulat Magyar Irod. Intézet és Kőnyvnyomda., 1914., Nr. 178., pp. 291-292.

Bundesgerichtshof Schweiz (Tribunal Federal Suisse), Urteil der I. Zivilabteilung vom 21. November 1914, Nr. 100. BGE 40 II 601, pp.. 601-607.

Bundesgerichtshof Schweiz (Tribunal Federal Suisse), Arrêt de la Ire Section civile du 15 decembre 1926, Nr. 64, BGE 52 II 393, pp.. 393-400.

Cour d’Appel de Bruxelles, 30 décembre 1893 // Journal des Tribunaux (Belge) (1894), 13me année – 1894. Bruxelles: Vve Ferdinand Larcier, Libraire-Éditeur. No. 1026. (21 janvier 1894), Col. 87-89.

Cour d’Appel de Bruxelles (1re Chambre), 19 avril 1939. Le Journal des Tribunaux (Belge) (1939), Bruxelles: F. Larcier., № 3573, col. 326-329.

Cour d’Appel de Paris, 18 février 1904, Dalloz. Jurisprudence Générale. Recueil périodique et critique de jurisprudence, de legislation et de doctrine. Année 1907. Paris: Au Bureau de Jurisprudence Générale., II Partie, pp. 201-205 (Dall. Per. 1907 II 201, pp. 201-205.).

Cour de Cassation (Chambre Criminelle), 18 novembre 1904. Annales de la propriété industrielle, artistique et littéraire. Cinquante et unieme tome. Tome LI. Paris: Chez Arthur M. Rousseau, Editeur, 1905., pp. 181-185, Art. 4524.

Königliche Geheimer Ober-Tribunal (Preußische Ober-Tribunal), Erkenntniß vom 27. Oktober 1847, Nr. 35. Entscheidungen des Königlichen Geheimen Ober-Tribunals, herausgeben im amtlichen Auftrage von dem Geheimen-Ober-Tribunals-Räthen. Dr. Seligo, Ruhlmeyer und Wilke I. Funfzenter Band. Berlin: Verlag von Carl Heymann, 1848, pp. 329 – 337.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (Grazhdanskij Kassacіonnyj Departament), rѣshenіe ot 1880 goda 2 aprelya dnya. № 99. Rѣshenіya Grazhdanskago Kassacіonnago Departamenta Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata. 1880. S.-Peterburg”. Tipografіya Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata, 1881., pp. 384-388.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (4 Departament), Ukaz ot 1883 goda 8 dekabrya dnya. // Vil’son V. Sudebnaya praktika po torgovym dѣlam: rѣsheniya S. Peterburgskago Kommercheskago Suda i Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata (4 D-ta i Obshchago Sobranіya). S.-Peterburg: Knizhnyj magazin yuridicheskoj literatury D. V. Chichinadze, 1896, pp.. 172-175, D. № 96.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (4 Departament), opredelenіe ot 7 іyunya 1890 g. № 871 // Grebner, V. Praktika 4-go Departamenta i Vtorogo Obshchago Sobranіya Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata po torgovym delam 1889-1896 gg. Chast’ II. S.-Peterburg: Tipografіya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1896., № 36, pp.. 73-76.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (4 Departament), opredelenіe ot 6 fevralya 1891 g. № 191 // Grebner, V. Praktika 4-go Departamenta i Vtorogo Obshchago Sobranіya Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata po torgovym delam 1889-1896 gg. Chast’ II. S.-Peterburg: Tipografіya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1896., № 35, pp.. 71-73.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (4 Departament), opredelenіe ot 13 іyunya / 31 oktyabrya 1891 g. № 904/1526 // Grebner, V. Praktika 4-go Departamenta i Vtorogo Obshchago Sobranіya.

Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata po torgovym delam 1889-1896 gg. Chast’ II. S.-Peterburg: Tipografіya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1896. № 34, pp. 68-71.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (Ugolovnyj Kassatsіonnyj Departament), rѣshenіe ot 19 noyabrya 1902 g. (po dѣlu doktora meditsiny P. Modlinskago), № 33. // Rѣshenіya Ugolovnago Kassatsіonnago Departamenta Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata. 1902. S.-Peterburg: Senatskaya tipografіya, 1902., pp. 84-91.

Pravitel’stvuyushchij Senat (Sudebnyj Departament), ukaz ot 24 yanvarya 1914 g. № 186. Pravo. Ezhenѣdel’naya yuridicheskaya gazeta [Law. Weekly legal newspaper]. 1914 g. № 11, Voskresen’e 16 marta., pp.. 933-934.

Reichsgericht, Urt. v. 09.12.1904, Az.: Rep. II. 61/04 (ERG in Zivilsachen, Bd. 59, pp. 284 – 287).

Reichsgericht, Urt. v. 28.10.1910, Az.: Rep. II. 688/09 (ERG in Zivilsachen, Bd. 74, pp. 308 – 313).

Reichsgericht, Urt. v. 26.09.1924, Az. Rep.: II 578/23 (ERG in Zivilsachen, Bd. 109, pp. 213 – 215).

Reichsgericht, Urt. v. 11.06.1926, Az Rep.: II 327/25 (ERG in Zivilsachen, Bd. 114, pp. 90 –97).

Reichsgericht, Urt. v. 03.06.1927, Az.: Rep. II. 346/26 (ERG in Zivilsachen, Bd. 117, pp. 215 – 226).

Routh v. Webster, 10 Beav. 561, 28 January 1847. Reports of Cases in Chancery, Argued and Determined in the Rolls Court during the time of Lord Langdale, Master of the Rolls. Vol. X. 1846, 1847. Beavan, Ch. (ed.) London: William Benning and Co., 1849, pp. 561–563.

Sankt-Peterburgskij Kommercheskij Sud, rѣshenie ot 13 dekabrya 1882 g. // Vil’son, V. Sudebnaya praktika po torgovym dѣlam: rѣsheniya S. Peterburgskago Kommercheskago Suda i Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata (4 D-ta i Obshchago Sobranіya). S.-Peterburg: Knizhnyj magazin yuridicheskoj literatury D. V. Chichinadze, 1896, pp. 176-177, D. № 97.

Sankt-Peterburgskij Kommercheskij Sud, rѣshenie ot 13 noyabrya 1889 g. // Vil’son, V. Sudebnaya praktika po torgovym dѣlam: rѣsheniya S. Peterburgskago Kommercheskago Suda i Pravitel’stvuyushchago Senata (4 D-ta i Obshchago Sobranіya). S.-Peterburg: Knizhnyj magazin yuridicheskoj literatury D. V. Chichinadze, 1896, pp. 177-180 (D. № 98).

Trib. civ. de la Seine (1re Ch.), 25 mai 1891 / Cour d’Appel de Paris, 28 juillet 1892. Annales de la propriété industrielle, artistique et littéraire. Quarante-deuxime annee. Tome XLII. Paris: Chez Arthur M. Rousseau, Editeur, 1896, pp. 314-316, Art. 3885

Trib. comm. de Bruxelles, 4 avril 1931 // Trib. comm. de Bruxelles, 27 janvier 1932 // Cour d’Appel de Bruxelles, 4 juin 1932 , La Jurisprudence commerciale de Bruxelles, 1932, 237.

大審院, 大正四年六月五日第三民事部判決, 大審院民事判決録(民録)21輯898頁 (Supreme Court of Japan, Judgment of the 3 Civil Division of June 5, 1914, Protocols of the civil judgments of the Supreme Court (Minlu), Vol. 21, p. 898.)

Downloads

Published

31.12.2025

How to Cite

The Right to a Firm in the Legal Doctrine and Judicial Practice of the Russian Empire. (2025). Bratislava Law Review, 9(2), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2025.9.2.1121

Similar Articles

1-10 of 276

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.