Economic Analysis of Criminal Law
Between the Economics of Crime and Criminal Dogmatics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2026.10.1.1050Keywords:
Economics of Crime, Criminal Law, Optimum of Criminal InterventionAbstract
The paper discusses the teleological-functionalism of Criminal Law and its paradox between freedom and control, promoting an interpretative economic analysis of Criminal Law. To this end, the following question was formulated: what is meant by an Interpretative Economic Analysis of Criminal Law, considering the methodological framework of the objects investigated within Criminal Law and the Economics of Crime? It presents paradigms of efficiency, optimal criminal intervention, and systemic dysfunctions depending on the criminological school chosen by the interpreter. The general objective is to propose an interdisciplinary methodological framework between teleological-functionalism and microeconomics, highlighting the objects of an interpretative economic analysis of Criminal Law. This is a qualitative, documentary research with a hypothetical-deductive approach, utilising Aristotelian syllogism for hypothesis construction and, from a utilitarian perspective, presenting deductions that are falsifiable, particularly in empirical research on the economic efficiency of criminal policy.
References
Alves RB, Ciência criminal [Forensic Science] (Rio de Janeiro, Forense 1998).
American Economic Association, ‘Journal of Economic Literature Codes’ https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.php accessed 25 July 2023.
Andrade MC, ‘Métodos ocultos de investigação’ [Covert investigative methods] in Mário Ferreira Monte and others, Que futuro para o direito processual penal: simpósio em homenagem a Jorge de Figueiredo Dias [What Does the Future Hold for Criminal Procedural Law: A Symposium in Honor of a Jorge de Figueiredo Dias] (Coimbra, Coimbra Editora 2009).
Antunes MJ, ‘A problemática penal e o tribunal constitucional’ [Criminal Law Issues and the Constitutional] in Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho, vol I [Studies in Honor of Professor Dr. José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho] (Coimbra, Coimbra Editora 2012).
Beccaria C, Dei delitti e delle pene [On Crimes and Punishments] (Milão, Renato Fabietti 1973).
Becker GS, ‘Crime and punishment: an economic approach’ (1968) 76 Journal of Political Economy 169.
Bentham J, Principles of Penal Law (University of Adelaide Library 2012).
Bitencourt CR, Tratado de direito penal: parte geral, [Treatise on Criminal Law: General Part] (24th edn, São Paulo, Saraiva 2018).
Carvalho S, Antimanual de criminologia [The Anti-Manual of Criminology] (6th edn, São Paulo, Saraiva 2015).
Conde FM and Arán MG, Derecho penal: parte general [Criminal Law: General Part]] (6th edn, Valência, Tirant lo Blanch 2004).
Cooter R and Ulen T, Direito e economia [Direito e economia] (5th edn, Porto Alegre, Bookman 2010).
Coutinho L, Hugo Chávez, o espectro [Hugo Chávez, the specter] (São Paulo, Vestígio 2018).
Delmanto C and others, Código penal comentado [Annotated Penal Code] (9th edn, São Paulo, Saraiva 2016).
Dias AS, Delicta in se e delicta mere prohibita [Offenses that are prohibited in and of themselves] (Coimbra, Coimbra Editora 2008).
Dias JF and Andrade MC, Criminologia: o homem delinquente e a sociedade criminógena [Criminology: The Delinquent and the Crime-Inducing Society] (Coimbra, Coimbra Editora 2013).
Ferrajoli L, Direito e razão: teoria do garantismo penal [Law and Reason: The Theory of Criminal Guarantees] (São Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais 2002).
Gico Jr I, ‘Bem-estar social e o conceito de eficiência’ [Social Welfare and the Concept of Efficiency] (2020) 16(2) Revista Brasileira de Direito.
Hassemer W, ‘Características e crises do moderno direito penal’ [Characteristics and Crises of Modern Criminal Law] (2003) 18 Revista Síntese de Direito Penal e Processual Penal 144.
Jakobs G, Derecho penal parte general: fundamentos y teoría de la imputación [Criminal Law – General Part: Foundations and Theory of Criminal Liability] (Madri, Marcial Pons 1995).
Jescheck H-H and Weigend T, Tratado de derecho penal: parte general [Treatise on Criminal Law: General Part] (5th edn, Granada, Comares 2002).
Lenin VI, O Estado e a revolução [The State and the Revolution] (Lisboa, Editorial Avante 1977).
von Liszt F, Tratado de direito penal alemão [A Treatise on German Criminal Law] (Rio de Janeiro, F Briguet & C 1899).
Mackaay E and Rousseau S, Análise econômica do direito [Economic Analysis of Law] (2nd edn, São Paulo, Atlas 2015).
Marina JA, Crónicas de la ultramodernidad [Chronicles of Ultramodernity] (Barcelona, Anagrama 2000).
Maultasch G, Contra toda censura [Against All Censorship] (São Paulo, Avis Rara 2022).
Melo OAL, Análise econômica dos direitos fundamentais [An Economic Analysis of Fundamental Rights] (São Paulo, Dialética 2023).
Monteiro FM and Cardoso GR, ‘A seletividade do sistema prisional brasileiro’ [The Selectivity of the Brazilian Prison System] (2013) 13(1) Civitas – Revista de Ciências Sociais 93.
Nery FS and Nadanovsky P, ‘Homicide impunity in Brazil between 2006 and 2016’ (2020) 54 Revista de Saúde Pública 144.
North D, ‘Institutions’ (1991) 5(1) Journal of Economic Perspectives 97.
Panther SM, ‘The economics of crime and criminal law’ (1995) 2(4) European Journal of Law and Economics 365.
Posner R, Economic Analysis of Law (New York, Aspen Publishers 2010).
Posner R, Fronteiras da teoria do direito [Frontiers of Legal Theory] (São Paulo, Martins Fontes 2011).
Rodrigues FA, Análise econômica da expansão do direito penal [An Economic Analysis of the Expansion of Criminal Law] (2nd edn, Belo Horizonte, Del Rey 2021).
Rodrigues FA, O juiz professor [The judge, who is a professor] (São Paulo, Dialética 2022).
Rodrigues FA and Rodrigues LBPS, Lavagem de dinheiro e crime organizado [Money laundering and organized crime] (Belo Horizonte, Del Rey 2016).
Rodrigues FA and Yeung L, ‘Análise econômica do direito ou do judiciário brasileiro?’ [An economic analysis of Brazilian law or the Brazilian judiciary?] in Silva AMD F da, II Seminário de Direito e Economia do Nordeste [Northeastern Law and Economics Seminar] (Natal, OAB-RN 2021).
Roxin C, Derecho penal parte general [Criminal Law: General Part] (Madri, Civitas 1997).
Roxin C, ‘O conceito de bem jurídico como padrão crítico da norma penal posto à prova’ [The concept of the protected legal interest as a critical standard for the penal norm put to the test’] (2013) 23(112) Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Criminal 100.
Silva Sánchez J-M, A expansão do direito penal [The Expansion of Criminal Law] (2nd edn, São Paulo, Editora Revista dos Tribunais 2011).
Silva Sánchez J-M, Eficiência e direito penal [Efficiency and Criminal Law] (Barueri, Manole 2004).
Santos NBC and Rodrigues FA, ‘Os jogos da leniência’ [The Games of Leniency] (2017) 14(78) Revista Direito Público 54.
Schaefer GJ and Shikida PFA, ‘Economia do crime’ [Economia do crime] (2000) 18(33) Revista Análise Econômica 195.
Shikida PFA and Borilli SP, ‘Economia do crime’ [The economics of crime] (2006) 24(46) Revista Análise Econômica 4.
Stratenwerth G, Derecho penal parte general I [Criminal Law: General Part] (Madri, Civitas 2000).
Wendel T and Curtis R, ‘Tolerância zero: a má interpretação dos resultados’ [Zero Tolerance: The Misinterpretation of the Results] (2002) 8(18) Horizontes Antropológicos 267.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bratislava Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
